From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash
On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 06:56:08 -0500, -hh
wrote:
>On 2/21/26 02:19, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 21:51:08 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>
>>> Nah, I used that minor windfall to poke at another luzer sockpuppet.
>>> Since they ran, you're welcome to take their arrow: in what year did
>>> you exceed $25/hr in your career (if ever)? Do be ready to prove it.
>>
>> Right after you prove you've been published....
>
>Already done weeks ago, by citing a paper which cited it.
>
>
Nope, sorry. I saw that before and it doesn't work. I can find all
sort of references to things that people with my name did, too. Most
everybody can. Your "proof" fails.
Even if that is actually you, which you haven't proved, belonging to a
group that authored an obscure document is quite different from
actually being published.
The fact that you would use that obscure document to claim to have
been published only demonstrates that you really are a dishonest phony
underneath a lot of bluster and noise.
>FYI, you've tried & failed to show that you yourself passed too:
Passed what? You asked a question and I answered it. That you don't
like my answer is not my problem.
>Your first hand-wave attempt included passive and household income.
Hughie blusters more nonsense hoping to distract from his own
failures...
>Your second hand-wave attempt was a 'dog ate my homework' dodge, with
>you alleging to not have a Social Security account to log on to see
>earned income history listed there.
>
>BTW, the SS website also has personal lifetime payments into Medicare:
>how far under $15K lifetime was your's? Because that would mean that
>you're taking more than you paid in, a sign of being a 'socialist loser'.
Hughie blusters more nonsense hoping to distract from his own
failures...
>-hh
>
--
Only losers want Socialism or Communism.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
