From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash
On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:01:28 -0500, -hh
wrote:
>On 2/21/26 15:13, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:17:34 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2026-02-21, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:16:24 -0500, NoBody wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 06:56:08 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/21/26 02:19, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 21:51:08 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nah, I used that minor windfall to poke at another luzer sockpuppet.
>>>>>>>> Since they ran, you're welcome to take their arrow: in what year did
>>>>>>>> you exceed $25/hr in your career (if ever)? Do be ready to prove it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right after you prove you've been published....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Already done weeks ago, by citing a paper which cited it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You post a link to an 8 page document with no specifics about what
>>>>> you're trying to say.
>>>>>
>>>>> Typical response from you.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI, you've tried & failed to show that you yourself passed too:
>>>>>
>>>>> Pot, kettle, black.
>>>>
>>>> Hughie insinuated that he was "special"
>>>
>>> Special?
>>> So Hugh was/is a short bus passenger?
>>
>> Hughie doesn't document any of his claims, ...
>
>Except for how you saw & tried to disregard one just ~6 hours earlier:
Hughie makes claims that he doesn't back up. I don't make claims.
Hughie asked a question and I answered it. It wasn't a claim. It was
an answer to a question and since I felt no obligation to answer, I
felt no obligation to document it.
>"Nope, sorry. I saw that before and it doesn't work."
LOL> Says the guy you insinuated there was something special about a
simple picture he had on his poorly constructed web site that anybody
could have had.
...and then he said, "oh lookie, lookie at what I can do. I can make
it so you can't see it any more. Aren't I just so special because I
can do that?"
Hey, hughie, ya pathetic dimbulb, I've got several thousand pictures
on my hard drives that don't exist anywhere on the Internet.
>> ...including that silliness about him making $25/hour as a volunteer,
>> but he asks other people if they made that much and demands that
>> they be prepared to document it.
>
>Because the dodging & whining response was the point ... and the Tell.
No, Hughie, the point is that you are a sad little phony who has never
done anything of significance who is trying to pretend that you have.
I don't know who you're tring to impress, but I don't think it's
working.
>> Hughie is a phony, and not terribly bright.
>
>Nah: y'all have been hoisted on your own petard.
Irony anyone?????
> That's why you're
>desperately doing backflips trying to find new excuses: trivializing
>published works, 'same name', Ad Hominems. It has driven y'all nuts.
The document might have been important... just not to me... and
that you posted it apparently believing that it documented you to have
been "published" makes the whole thing delightfully laughable.
You're a friggen joke, Hughie...
>So here's a Kewpie doll as a little old prize for ya:
>
>
OMG, Hughie thinks that because he's a NYTimes subscriber makes him
"special."
You're special, Hughie, so special.
But no, I quit reading that yellow rag a long time ago.
>-hh
--
Only losers want Socialism or Communism.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
