From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash   
      
   On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 08:12:08 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-02-22 03:29, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 15:42:51 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2026-02-21 15:00, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:24:58 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2026-02-19 05:03, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:04:02 -0500, -hh   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Whatever its activities may have been, a broad array of legal   
   >>>>>>> specialists on the use of lethal force have said that the U.S. strikes   
   >>>>>>> are illegal, extrajudicial killings — because the military cannot   
   >>>>>>> deliberately target civilians who do not pose an imminent threat of   
   >>>>>>> violence, even if they are suspected of engaging in criminal acts."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   "A broad array of legal specialists" babbled that, eh?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> On the other hand....   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/poll-71-of-regist   
   red-us-voters-support-trump-s-strikes-on-boats-smuggling-drugs/ar-AA1OeiCt   
   >>>>> The trouble is that the question they ask assumes that the boats are   
   >>>>> ACTUALLY smuggling drugs...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I assume they are... Try and convince me otherwise.....   
   >>> That's not the way it works.   
   >>   
   >> That's the way it works for me.   
   >I'll remember that... ...for when you're targeted.   
      
   When I'm targeted for what?   
      
   --   
   Only losers want Socialism or Communism.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)