From: invalid@none.com
In article <10nf9so$27vbh$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2026-02-22 03:29, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 15:42:51 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >
> >> On 2026-02-21 15:00, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:24:58 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2026-02-19 05:03, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:04:02 -0500, -hh
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Whatever its activities may have been, a broad array of legal
> >>>>>> specialists on the use of lethal force have said that the U.S. strikes
> >>>>>> are illegal, extrajudicial killings โค? because the military cannot
> >>>>>> deliberately target civilians who do not pose an imminent threat of
> >>>>>> violence, even if they are suspected of engaging in criminal acts."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "A broad array of legal specialists" babbled that, eh?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On the other hand....
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/poll-71-of-regis
ered-us-voters-support-trump-s-strikes-on-boats-smuggling-drugs/ar-AA1OeiCt
> >>>> The trouble is that the question they ask assumes that the boats are
> >>>> ACTUALLY smuggling drugs...
> >>>
> >>> I assume they are... Try and convince me otherwise.....
> >> That's not the way it works.
> >
> > That's the way it works for me.
> I'll remember that... ...for when you're targeted.
Why would he be targeted? He's not running drug boats
across the water.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
