From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-02-22 10:14, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10nf9so$27vbh$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-02-22 03:29, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 15:42:51 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-02-21 15:00, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:24:58 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2026-02-19 05:03, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:04:02 -0500, -hh   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Whatever its activities may have been, a broad array of legal   
   >>>>>>>> specialists on the use of lethal force have said that the U.S. strikes   
   >>>>>>>> are illegal, extrajudicial killings â€? because the military cannot   
   >>>>>>>> deliberately target civilians who do not pose an imminent threat of   
   >>>>>>>> violence, even if they are suspected of engaging in criminal acts."   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   "A broad array of legal specialists" babbled that, eh?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On the other hand....   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/poll-71-of-regis   
   ered-us-voters-support-trump-s-strikes-on-boats-smuggling-drugs/ar-AA1OeiCt   
   >>>>>> The trouble is that the question they ask assumes that the boats are   
   >>>>>> ACTUALLY smuggling drugs...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I assume they are... Try and convince me otherwise.....   
   >>>> That's not the way it works.   
   >>>   
   >>> That's the way it works for me.   
   >> I'll remember that... ...for when you're targeted.   
   >   
   > Why would he be targeted? He's not running drug boats   
   > across the water.   
      
   Won't matter.   
      
   They'll just say he was, and you'll accept it without any evidence at all...   
      
   ...right?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)