From: recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
On 2/23/26 07:12, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 02:37:10 -0500, -hh wrote:
>> On 2/22/26 18:09, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 16:20:10 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>>> On 2/22/26 09:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 08:03:56 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/21/26 17:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:01:28 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/21/26 15:13, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:17:34 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-02-21, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:16:24 -0500, NoBody
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 06:56:08 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/21/26 02:19, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 21:51:08 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nah, I used that minor windfall to poke at another luzer
sockpuppet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since they ran, you're welcome to take their arrow: in what
year did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you exceed $25/hr in your career (if ever)? Do be ready to
prove it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right after you prove you've been published....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Already done weeks ago, by citing a paper which cited it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You post a link to an 8 page document with no specifics about what
>>>>>>>>>>>> you're trying to say.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Typical response from you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI, you've tried & failed to show that you yourself passed too:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pot, kettle, black.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hughie insinuated that he was "special"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Special?
>>>>>>>>>> So Hugh was/is a short bus passenger?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hughie doesn't document any of his claims, ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Except for how you saw & tried to disregard one just ~6 hours earlier:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hughie makes claims that he doesn't back up. I don't make claims.
>>>>>>> Hughie asked a question and I answered it. It wasn't a claim. It was
>>>>>>> an answer to a question and since I felt no obligation to answer, I
>>>>>>> felt no obligation to document it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, for your "answer" wasn't to what the question had asked.
>>>>>
>>>>> You asked if and when I first earned $25/hour and I told you
>>>>> would have been in the early to mid 1980s.
>>>>
>>>> Not quite, because what you actually said was:
>>>>
>>>> " Without looking it up, I'd say it was early or mid 1980s
>>>> that I made over $50K annually,....I'm pretty sure of what I posted
>>>> based on what I was investing back then"
>>>>
>>>> That's you admitting that you were relying on total household income
>>>> including passive (not 'earned') income sources.
>>>
>>> Take it or leave it. I don't care.
>>
>> "The lady, she doth protest too much..." /s
>
> Hughie doesn't know what "protest" means... "take it or leave
> it" is not a protest, dummy.
The protest was your multiple repetitions after that.
>>>>>> That's been pointed out to you and you've been silent.
>>>>>> Telling.
>>>>
>>>> Still.
>>>
>>> I'm kind of a quiet guy.
>>
>> Your posting proliferation proves otherwise.
>
> Blah, blah, blah...
Demonstrates motivation.
>>>>>>>> "Nope, sorry. I saw that before and it doesn't work."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL> Says the guy you insinuated there was something special about a
>>>>>>> simple picture he had on his poorly constructed web site that anybody
>>>>>>> could have had.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not a random photo, but relevant to that topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> A picture of part of a weapon that anybody could have had.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, the FN-303 is a restricted item that US public can't legally own.
>>>
>>> Nope. It is not universally illegal to own one, Dummy.
>>
>> Goalpost move attempt.
>
> Yes, that's what you're doing below:
>
>> In the US that their sale is restricted.
>
> Hughie said it was illegal. It's not illegal. Now, Hughie is the
> one moving the goalpost to say it's restricted.
I said: "the FN-303 is a restricted item that US public can't legally
own." The first part is absolutely correct: FN US restricts their
sales. The latter "US" is an error because I know that they're illegal
to personally own in my own State and certainly some others, but I
didn't bother to check every last State & local jurisdiction, because
its a moot point because FN US already restricts them nationwide.
> Actually, it's not even restricted. There's no federal law against
> buying or selling one. I suppose there might be local laws where
> leftists rule against self-defense.
Restricted by FN US nation-wide. Noting a lack of a federal law does
not constitute proof of no other State/Local restrictions, so the onus
is on you to prove that they're universally legal in all jurisdictions
in all 50 States plus DC & territories...good luck!
>>>>>>> ...and then he said, "oh lookie, lookie at what I can do. I can make
>>>>>>> it so you can't see it any more. Aren't I just so special because I
>>>>>>> can do that?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. It was showing relevant knowledge of the topic at hand.
>>>>>
>>>>> It did no such thing. One could show a picture of a nuclear
>>>>> reactor without knowing anything about nuclear reactors, you pathetic
>>>>> moron.
>>>>
>>>> "The public doesn't get to see everything."
>>
>> Silence. Hmmmm!
>
> Hmmmm? You babble some irrelevant nonsense and expected a reply?
Don't you recognize own words?
>>>>>> Plus it shows ownership/control of the domain I'm posting from, which
>>>>>> neither none of the anonymous troll sockpuppets here can do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, Hughie owns the domain... You're special, Hughie, oh so
>>>>> special...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...as if anyone can't register their own domain....
>>>>
>>>> You certainly could too...but you've not.
>>>
>>> What makes you believe that?
>>
>> You're not using it.
>
> How would a ditz like you know if I am or had ever been using my
> own domain, Dummy?
Because .dash is not an available top-level domain (TLD), so your
alleged posting domain is impossible.
>>>>>>> Hey, hughie, ya pathetic dimbulb, I've got several thousand pictures
>>>>>>> on my hard drives that don't exist anywhere on the Internet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because context matters. How many of them are uniquely of nonlethal
>>>>>> weapons used by LEO that was part of that topic on ICE, hmmm?
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
