From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10nhsls$32ar5$1@dont-email.me>,   
   recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2/23/26 06:04, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10nh0t3$2oja9$3@dont-email.me>,   
   > > recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2/23/26 01:18, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 12:43:55 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> No video exists which shows enough detail to determine there is "no   
   > >>>> fishing gear".   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Bullshit.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I lived of the coast of The Gulf of America for 50+ years and   
   > >>> I've been fishing both commercially and leisurely. I know what   
   > >>> to look for and NONE of those boats in THAT depth of water had   
   > >>> what it takes to land fish out that deep. > Also... most "fishing boats"   
   that go out that deep, have flying   
   > >>> bridges to spot fish. If you're just dropping a line to catch   
   > >>> Amberjack, you don't NEED to be offshore 100 to 300 miles.   
   > >>   
   > >> Your regional bias (& limited knowledge) is showing.   
   > >>   
   > >> Case in point, look at (19°28'12.0"N 79°07'48.0"W) and why there are   
   > >> small boats which actually venture way out to this location to drop a   
   > >> line.  No, not troll, but drift fishing.  Naturally, they're going to   
   > >> make best speed to get there & back, right?  Is that illegal?   
   > >>   
   > >>> The smugglers are using speed boats.   
   > >>   
   > >> Sure, some are - but that doesn't make ALL speed boats into smugglers.   
   > >   
   > > No just the ones that are. You dimwit.   
   >   
   > But without the hard evidence, you can't tell the difference.   
      
   I believe our DEA.   
   >   
   > Especially to legal standards.  There's already been one wrongful death   
   > lawsuit filed, and there's invariably going to be more.  Because even if   
   > one wants to claim "Drug War" to use LOAC, there's already been clear   
   > violations of that perpetrated by US forces too.   
   >   
   > FYI, claiming "classified intelligence" is a weak dodge, as the US has   
   > used legally proper 'Chain of Custody' standards for classified material   
   > and suitable venues for it.  Its because we've learned from history that   
   > intelligence data isn't particularly reliable:  there's many examples of   
   > double agent spies and the like who've provided bad intelligence.  One   
   > famous one was "Operation Mincemeat":   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > Another less well known one was "Agent Garbo", was was the only spy to   
   > have received medals from both Germany & UK during World War II:   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >   
   > -hh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)