From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10nli1b$cepo$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-02-22 14:47, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10nfm9d$2cq0n$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-02-22 11:27, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 11:09:51 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> On 2026-02-22 10:13, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any denial of drug trafficking...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> 'These premeditated and intentional killings lack any   
   > >>>>>>>>>> plausible legal justification.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> In your opinion.   
   > >>>>>>>> You said you "didn't see any denial of drug trafficking" in   
   > >>>>>>>> that   
   > >>>> filing.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> That's a quote FROM that filing and it clearly constitutes   
   > >>>>>>>> such a   
   > >>>> denial.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Nope. Neither the complaint from the relatives nor the court   
   > >>>>>>> filing denied that the boat was carrying drugs.   
   > >>>>>> "Lacking any plausible legal justification" does precisely that.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Drug boats get FAFO.  Dael with it hater.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Why has literally NO evidence that these were "drug boats" been   
   produced?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I doubt you know everything that has been produced.   
   > >> I doubt you can show ANYTHING that's been produced.   
   > >   
   > > Videos and the words of the DEA is good enough for me.   
   >   
   > No evidence has been presented.   
      
   Who do you think you are? You don't demand shit.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)