From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10nli37$cepo$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-02-22 14:46, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10nfk9v$2bftr$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-02-22 10:13, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>>>>>>>> I didn't see any denial of drug trafficking...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> 'These premeditated and intentional killings lack any   
   > >>>>>>>> plausible legal justification.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> In your opinion.   
   > >>>>>> You said you "didn't see any denial of drug trafficking" in   
   > >>>>>> that   
   > >> filing.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> That's a quote FROM that filing and it clearly constitutes   
   > >>>>>> such a   
   > >> denial.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Nope. Neither the complaint from the relatives nor the court   
   > >>>>> filing denied that the boat was carrying drugs.   
   > >>>> "Lacking any plausible legal justification" does precisely that.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Drug boats get FAFO.  Dael with it hater.   
   > >>   
   > >> Why has literally NO evidence that these were "drug boats" been produced?   
   > >   
   > > Why do you need any? I believe them. I saw the videos,   
   > > good enough for me.   
   >   
   > What in any video you saw supported that these boats were transporting   
   > drugs...   
   >   
      
   The DEA said so.   
      
   > ...and if they were, why not stop them...   
      
   Fuck em.   
   >   
   > ...as Trump did in his first term?   
      
   He learned.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)