XPost: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc   
   From: mr@sandman.net   
      
   In article <4ce2f6eb$0$1590$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,   
    sgordon@changethisparttohardbat.com wrote:   
      
   > : > I'm not talking about copying a laserdisc, but using the master that   
   > : > was used to create the laserdisc.   
   > : I talked about that in the part of my post that you snipped out.   
   >   
   > Sorry about that.  With respect to the master being analog, that in and   
   > of itself doesn't make it bad, after all, the film itself is analog.   
   > However, not setting the anamorphic flag during encoding *is* bad.   
   > And easily corrected (by the studio, that is).   
      
   A master for a low-resolution format such as laserdics can't be   
   expected to work well for 1080p digital content, is my point.   
      
   Whether it is anamorphic or not doesn't make much difference then :)   
      
      
   --   
   Sandman[.net]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)