From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article <64ea1754-d20a-4bce-bc9e-2e4ee999e304@googlegroups.com>,   
    wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 9:33:25 PM UTC-8, Your Name wrote:   
   > > In article , Mr. Man-wai Chang   
   > >  wrote:   
   > > > On 8/12/2016 4:48 AM, Your Name wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Only that it'll be more JarJar Abrams / Disney crap that doesn't   
   > > > > actually fit with the already established Star Wars story and   
   > > > > background.  :-(   
   > > >   
   > > > Why everyone got a bad feeling about JJB? I just cannot understand. JJB   
   > > > is just a joker in the movie. With humor, one might laugh! ;)   
   > >   
   > > I don't have any problem with Jar Jar Binks (it *is* a series of movies   
   > > aimed at kids after all!) ... JarJar /Abrams/ on the other hand is a   
   > > completely talentless moron who goes around ruining franchises, and   
   > > George Lucas selling out to Disney was a silly idea.  :-(   
   >   
   > You mean JJ Abrams? He has nothing to do with Rogue One.   
      
   I never said he did ... I said both JJ Abrams and Disney in the very   
   first and very last (except for your reply) quoted sentences.   
      
   BUT, any new material now has to fit with Disney's silly new ideas,   
   which does include JarJar Abrams' lazy "reboot"-in-all-but-name crap.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)