Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.starwars    |    Another Star Wars fan-base    |    46,595 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 46,451 of 46,595    |
|    Job Bautista to All    |
|    Obi-Wan doesn't need the high ground to     |
|    17 May 21 19:07:21    |
      From: jobbautista9@aol.com              This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)       --rYIvOf4rzo6ZcezgiGnSJHnYtOAsQ3ypa       Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8       Content-Language: en-US       Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable              (Originally written by u/dumname2_1 and u/MetaCommando of Reddit)              Obi-Wan doesn't need to be on the high ground, the high ground just       needs to exist within the battle; Obi-Wan knows that when he has the low       ground, he really has the high ground, from a certain point of view; see       Diagram A.              Look at his battle record:               Maul: Has low ground, wins Example A        Dooku: No high ground, loses        Dooku rematch: No high ground, loses Example B        Greivous: Has low ground, wins Example C        Vader: Has high ground, wins        Vader rematch: No high ground, loses              Obi-Wan with the high/low ground is canonically the most powerful Jedi.       This is fact. Had Yoda not denied his request to battle The Senate with       typical Jedi arrogance, Obi-Wan could have defeated Palpatine in the       Senate building, which housed a variety of different altitudes; this was       designed so that the Chancellor could always have the moral high ground       in political debates. But Obi-wan didn't fight The Senate, and Yoda soon       learned that you can't cleave the Sheev in a normal 1v1. It took the       Tusken Raiders years of conflict against Old Ben Kenobi to grasp his       superiority in terrain advantage, as you see them visibly flee in ANH       when they realize he holds the low (inverse-high) ground; this was the       optimal strategy against a near-invincible opponent.              Yoda is shorter than virtually every other fighter, which gives him a       permanent low-ground disadvantage; however, his saber-fighting style       utilizes a flipping-heavy technique in order to negate this weakness for       a temporary window. You'll notice that, after falling from the central       podium in The Senate's building, he immediately retreats upon realizing       he is on the lowest ground. You'll also notice that, while training       Luke, he rides on him like a mount, to gain the intellectual high ground       and accelerate Luke's training. Example D. Obi-Wan's defensive Form III       lightsaber style synergizes with his careful military maneuvers; as he       only strikes when prepared, he can always hold the strategic high       ground. (The business on Cato Neimodia doesn't count.) You'll come to       realize that this is why Commander Cody's artillery strike failed       against Obi-Wan, when hundreds of Jedi were killed in similar attacks.       Cody failed to grasp the strategic situation, as the Jedi Master's       elevation was superior to his by hundreds of meters, making him       virtually unkillable. (You'll notice that all the Jedi killed in Order       66 were on level ground with the clones, thereby assuring their demise.)       Had Cody taken his time and engaged the Jedi on even terrain, he would       have succeeded. Obi-Wan subsequently retreated under the surface of the       lake, so that he could maintain the topographical low/high ground. This       is why Obi-Wan is so willing to fight against impossible odds to the       point where he thrusts himself in immediate danger; when your       probability of victory is 1-to-10, you have the statistical (and              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca