Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.tolkien    |    JR Tolkien masturbatory worship echo    |    70,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 68,510 of 70,346    |
|    sean_q to tenworld    |
|    Re: Elrond remaining in Rivendell    |
|    14 Sep 11 10:30:49    |
      261a57dd       XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien       From: no.spam@no.spam              On 9/12/2011 11:29 AM, tenworld wrote:               > I think Elrond still held a grudge (maybe not the right word) that        > Aragon's ancestor did not destroy the ring when he could.              Surely, by the time of the War of the Ring, Elrond understood       that Isildur had no choice in the matter.              Among other properties the Ring had incredibly strong mind-control       powers when matters came down to its self-preservation.              Isildur wrote, "But for my part I will risk no hurt to this thing:       of all the works of Sauron the only fair. It is precious to me,       though I buy it with great pain."              When Frodo was called upon to try melting it, "The gold looked very       fair and pure, and Frodo thought how rich and beautiful was its colour,       how perfect was its roundness. It was an admirable thing and altogether       precious."              Frodo hadn't the strength of will to throw it even into his small fire.       Gandalf did have, but by his own admission even he, a powerful Wizard       would be mastered by the Ring's evil power before he could drop it       into the Crack of Doom, had he tried to wield it.              So no, I don't think Elrond held it against Isildur. Nor do I think       Elrond himself could have destroyed it either, if Gandalf speaks       the truth, and I think Elrond was wise enough to know it. Otherwise       he might have undertaken the Quest himself.              This wasn't just an plain old garden-variety magic ring; it had       the "best part of the strength that was native" to a powerful       and evil Maia, second only to Morgoth the Enemy.              For instance if I somehow bought Thor's hammer at a yard sale       in Oslo and tried using it to tap a picture-hanging tack       into the wall, I'd be lucky if the thing didn't demolish       the whole building. See _Farmer Giles of Ham_, where merely       brandishing a magic sword at a dragon was "quite enough"       to unleash its true power. Whereupon it delivered (or caused       the wielder to deliver) a crippling blow beyond his own       first intention.              How to neutralize such a magic token? It wasn't enough merely       to squirrel it away somewhere; Sauron was too powerful and       threatening even without the Ring on his hand.              Since it couldn't be destroyed by any strength of will, the Wise       had no choice but to rely on a long shot. A very long shot,       it seems, a fortuitous accident. However, the Wise, or at least       Gandalf, knew "There was more than one Power at work...       something else, beyond any design of the Ring-maker."              All they could do was give that other Power the best possible chance       to do its work. So they chose a "witless Hobbit", one with small       stature and therefore the one least vulnerable to corruption.              They knew even he would ultimately succumb. But it would be enough       if his free will took him only as far as the *Brink* of Doom before       claiming it as his own.              SQ              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca