c5d6eb00   
   XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien   
   From: youmustbejoking@lan.invalid   
      
   On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:03:31 -0800, derek wrote:   
      
   > On Dec 24, 3:14 pm, Dan C  wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:43:30 -0800, Paul S. Person wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > Outrage is an overreaction. And I can think of only one poster who   
   >> > can truly be said to be outraged over this point. But, of course, one   
   >> > is enough to validate your observation.   
   >>   
   >> OK, "outrage" may be a little strong.  But I count three in this thread   
   >> alone who feel the need to nitpick and point out "flaws" in a movie   
   >> which can only be judged by a patchwork trailer at this point.  That   
   >> was my point, after all.   
   >   
   > Really?  I just went through this whole thread, because I'd only seen   
   > one seriously negative comment - and Professor Von Schniffel is known to   
   > be an outrageous (and that's not an overreaction) overreactor.   
   > Surprisingly, even Paul seems to be withholding any condemnation until   
   > he can actually pretend to have watched the movie.  There are certainly   
   > not three people on this group pointing out flaws.   
      
   I count three, as I said.  Not that it matters much in the big scheme of   
   things, though, eh?     
      
      
   --   
   "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".   
   "Bother!" said Pooh, as he dropped the razor on his gonads.   
   Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/   
   Thanks, Obama: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/politica/thanks.jpg   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)