Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.tolkien    |    JR Tolkien masturbatory worship echo    |    70,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 68,775 of 70,346    |
|    Geza Giedke to Steve Morrison    |
|    Re: why not talk about the three?    |
|    05 Apr 12 09:45:57    |
      XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien       From: joedoe3@gmail.com              Steve Morrison schrieb am 04/04/2012 08:56 PM:       > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:38:13 +0000, Dan C wrote:       >       >> On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:23:45 -0400, Chris Hoelscher wrote:       >>       >>> at the Council of Elrond. Elrond (and others) refused to reveal the       >>> possessors The Three. WHY? At this same meeting they openly discussed       >>> the possessor of The One and its intended disposition - much more       >>> "dangerous" information to be made public (within the council       >>> attendees, that is) - so if the attendees could be trusted with intel       >>> on The One, why not on The Three? (or is/was there another reason for       >>> withholding the information?)       >>       >> Simple. It's a basic security fundamental. The fewer people who know       >> about something, the more secure that knowledge is. Why tell people who       >> don't need to know? That information was completely irrelevant to the       >> matters at hand during the Council of Elrond.       >       > Yes. I've always assumed that they /had/ to discuss the One, because       > what to do with it was largely what the Council was about! But there       > was no need to discuss the whereabouts of the Three.              moreover, the Three might still have a use independent of the fate of       the One Ring:       (a) it was not *known* that they would lose their power if the One was       destroyed (and I do not think that the keepers of the Three would have       revealed their identity if the rings still had power after the       destruction of the One)       (b) in the case that the One was regained by Sauron and then lost again,       keeping the Three secret might allow to have them available once Sauron       was defeated (by whatever means that might have been done).              But I think if more info about the Three had been important for the task       at hand, it would have been provided at the Council.                     regards        Geza              --        Now come ye all,       who have courage and hope! My call harken       to flight, to freedom in far places!        Lays of Beleriand              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca