Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.tolkien    |    JR Tolkien masturbatory worship echo    |    70,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 68,850 of 70,346    |
|    Troels Forchhammer to Steuard Jensen    |
|    Re: Three Hobbit movies: Bad idea    |
|    03 Aug 12 10:01:24    |
      XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien       From: Troels@ThisIsFake.invalid              On 2012-08-02 18:18, Steuard Jensen wrote:       >       > Yes, you really can. I first read it before second grade (I don't know       > if I was seven or eight years old at the time).              I can't really recall when I first read /LotR/ -- I believe I was a bit       older (in my teens) because I (by some deplorable accident of my       upbringing) didn't encounter it before then.              I did, however, read books of equal length and complexity long before my       tenth (I was seven or eight when I read an unabridged version of Verne's       /Mysterious Island/ during two days of illness).              > I'm quite certain that I missed out on a *lot* my first time or       > two, but it was immediately my favorite book by far.              Part of the whole point is that there are things in /LotR/ that most       25-years-olds are likely to miss -- the book is layered and complex, so       the fact that one can read it and like it is not the same as saying that       one can fully comprehend it. I know I got my first personal copy for my       eighteenth, and at that point there was still much that I not only       'just' didn't get, but which I was still too immature to be able to get.              The things that made it my favourite book in my teens are wholly       different from the things that make it my favourite book now (when my       oldest child is out of his teens).              If /LotR/ had been only what initially attracted me to it thirty-odd       years ago, it would not have been my favourite book today, and as I       perceive Christopher Tolkien's comments, he feels that the Jackson films       reduce the story to contain just that which attracts the adolescents       and leave out all that which keeps it a relevant favourite book for adults.              > (I'll admit that I was a pretty smart kid, though.)              I'd imagine :-) I should probably be making the same admission myself       (though the years have taught me not to confuse smart with mature -- as       a kid I was the former, not the latter).              --       Troels Forchhammer       Valid e-mail is |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca