XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien   
   From: mr@sandman.net   
      
   In article ,   
    Troels Forchhammer  wrote:   
      
   > >> Myself, I subscribe to the conclusion that Balrogs had wings and could   
   > >> fly after 1940. Mostly because I think a winged Balrog is cooler, and   
   > >> it requires less "interpretation" of the source material :)   
   >   
   > Well, you (Sandman) are Swedish, and I suppose we have to forgive those   
   > who have grown up with the Ohlmarks 'translation' for all kinds of   
   > misunderstandings of the text   
      
   I never read it in Swedish. I only read books in English.   
      
      
   --   
   Sandman[.net]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)