home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.fan.tolkien      JR Tolkien masturbatory worship echo      70,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 69,053 of 70,346   
   Troels Forchhammer to All   
   Re: (spoilers) Re: The Hobbit (Part 1) r   
   03 Jan 13 01:14:35   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien   
   From: Troels@ThisIsFake.invalid   
      
   In message    
   Lewis  spoke these staves:   
   >   
   > In message    
   >   Troels Forchhammer  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Saruman was definitely very different from all other of the Wise.   
   >> He alone ever sought to actually find and seize the Ring for   
   >> himself, and this he had begun long before he tried to use the   
   >> palantír and indeed before TA2851.   
   >   
   > My only objection to the way the film handles this is that Gandalf   
   > has no knowledge of Saruman's corruption at this point, and   
   > showing him as if he did no trust Saruman during the events of The   
   > Hobbit makes him seeking Saruman's advice during The Lord of the   
   > Rings foolish.   
      
   To be entirely fair, there is some justification for this in   
   /Unfinished Tales/ (to which the Tolkien Estate of course retains all   
   rights -- and are unlikely to unlock anything for Jackson).   
      
   Though the information on the rivalry between Gandalf and Saruman is   
   not entirely consistent throughout the various versions, Gandalf is   
   fairly consistently portrayed as reluctant to trust Saruman entirely   
   -- it would (in most versions) be going much too far to say that   
   Gandalf doubted Saruman or was suspicious about him -- it is just   
   that something held him back from being entirely honest. Also   
      
         Gandalf did not laugh again; and he did not answer, but   
       looking keenly at Saruman he drew on his pipe and sent out   
       a great ring of smoke with many smaller rings that followed   
       it. Then he put up his hand, as if to grasp them, and they   
       vanished. With that he got up and left Saruman without   
       another word; but Saruman stood for some time silent, and   
       his face was dark with doubt and displeasure.   
      
       This story appears in half a dozen different manuscripts,   
       and in one of them it is said that Saruman was suspicious,   
   /Unfinished Tales/, Part three, chapter IV 'The Hunt for the Ring'   
   (iii) 'Concerning Gandalf, Saruman and the Shire'   
      
   In a struck-out version of this story, Gandalf's purpose is   
   explained:   
       It was a strange chance, that being angered by his   
       insolence Gandalf chose this way of showing to Saruman his   
       suspicion that desire to possess them had begun to enter   
       into his policies and his study of the lore of the Rings;   
       and of warning him that they would elude him. For it cannot   
       be doubted that Gandalf had as yet no thought that the   
       Halflings (and still less their smoking) had any connection   
       with the Rings.  (ibid.)   
      
   However, as stated above, I do not think that Gandalf was quite this   
   suspicious of Saruman, and I suspect that this was the reason for   
   striking out this version. Christopher Tolkien comments on this   
   story, saying   
       The foregoing story shows that Gandalf himself suspected   
       Saruman of this at the time of the Council of 2851; though   
       my father afterwards commented that it appears from   
       Gandalf's story to the Council of Elrond of his meeting   
       with Radagast that he did not seriously suspect Saruman of   
       treachery (or of desiring the Ring for himself) until he   
       was imprisoned in Orthanc.   
      
   In general the evidence of the films and interviews with the writers   
   of the screen-play (that is, I don't really know about del Toro?)   
   suggests that they do not know /Unfinished Tales/ -- Phillipa Boyens   
   has stated that she has not read /The Silmarillion/ for the last 25   
   years in order not to accidentally use anything from that book, and   
   the same would by implication apply to /UT/ and any other book to   
   which they do not have the rights. And Boyens is by all accounts the   
   only one who has read /The Silmarillion/.   
      
   But, in any case, there is some justification for Gandalf's   
   suspicions, though the film-makers are unlikely to have known this   
   -)   
      
   --   
   Troels Forchhammer   
   Valid e-mail is    
   Please put [AFT], [RABT] or 'Tolkien' in subject.   
      
       Giving in is no defeat.   
       Passing on is no retreat.   
       Selves are made to rise above.   
       You shall live in what you love.   
    - Piet Hein, /The Me Above the Me/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca