Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.tolkien    |    JR Tolkien masturbatory worship echo    |    70,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 69,312 of 70,346    |
|    Sandman to Paul S. Person    |
|    Re: The Hobbit, part 2    |
|    13 Dec 13 12:56:15    |
      From: mr@sandman.net              In article <3puja9pchjiqc3fdgj394uoo644pvpnsuk@4ax.com>, Paul S. Person wrote:              > > Sandman:       > > But, the scenes in the book that are undeniably about action       > > (battles) are in turn very underwhelming, and the movies more than       > > delivers on what one's inner eye *wanted* to see. Battle of the       > > Five armies is the most obvious example of this.       >       > Actually, I quite like the fuller versions of many of the battles in       > the films.              > Well, not Helm's Deep -- that drags. How much does it drag? Although       > it only occupies 20 minutes of time (I timed it once from the DVD       > using a computer DVD player program that was very helpful in this       > regard), several reviewers asserted that it lasted 1 hour. When a 20       > minute battle /feels/ like it lasts an hour, there are problems. (In       > fairness, I should point out that the 20 minutes of Helm's Deep are       > interspersed with 20 minutes of two other story lines so that,       > overall, the entire 3-story-line sequence does take an hour or so.)              > But that is because I am seeing them. When I am reading them, JRRT's       > versions are much to be preferred. Blow-by-blow battle descriptions       > are for After Action Reports, not novels.              Yes, but I've recently read the two first book sin the Eragon series, and       while as good a writer as Tolkien by a longshot, the battles aren't       blow-by-blow (at least not all the time) but rather perfectly paced and       really engaging.              Same goes with the a Song of Ice and Fire books, who doesn't have that many       battles, but a lot of fights. And those are really well written as well.              So I'm in between here. I read Tolkiens books and when it comes to battles,       find myself wanting more. But not TOO much either.              > > Sandman:       > > You think? It was still a chapter, and he ran about for a couple       > > of *weeks* in the caves. I'm not sure I considering him having       > > matured in the caves...       >       > I /know/. I had a discussion on this point when the she-elf's       > existence was revealed, and it was on rabt.              You know he matured? I'd say he matured a whole lot more with his       encounters with Smaug... BUt I suppose it's all up to interpretation.                                   --       Sandman[.net]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca