XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien   
   From: mr@sandman.net   
      
   In article , Bill O'Meally wrote:   
      
   > > Sandman:   
   > > No problem. RGEO isn't considered canon, but since there is no   
   > > contradictory information elsewhere, I don't see why this couldn't   
   > > be taken as a possibility.   
   >   
   > Why not canon? It was published during his lifetime. I'd take it to   
   > be more canon than UT.   
      
   Yeah, sorry, mindburp. Of course it's canon. My bad   
      
      
   --   
   Sandman[.net]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)