Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.tolkien    |    JR Tolkien masturbatory worship echo    |    70,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,046 of 70,346    |
|    Steve Morrison to All    |
|    Turin's first sorrow    |
|    29 Oct 20 19:16:07    |
      XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien       From: rimagen@toast.net              This has bothered me for some time: /what/ was Turin's first sorrow       again?       After Turin left home for Doriath and was parted from Morwen, the text       of /CoH/ says, "This was the first of the sorrows of Turin." (/CoH/ p.       75, or /UT/ p. 73 for the corresponding passage in the /Narn/.) But       how can that be true? Lalaith had already died at that point!       Obviously the death in childhood of his beloved little sister was a       huge sorrow for him.       One possibility is that this was simply a traditional phrase which was       copied from earlier versions of the story. In fact, there is something       like it in the tale of "Turambar and the Foaloke": on p. 72 of /BoLT       2/ we read, "Very bitter indeed was that sundering, and for long Turin       wept and would not leave his mother, and this was the first of the       many sorrows that befell him in life." But in that case, it should       still have been edited out once the character of Lalaith was       introduced.       On the other hand, maybe it means "the first of the sorrows of Turin       *which was caused by Morgoth's curse*". I don't know, what do people       think?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca