Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.tolkien    |    JR Tolkien masturbatory worship echo    |    70,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,250 of 70,346    |
|    Steuard Jensen to All    |
|    Tolkien Newsgroups FAQ (10/16)    |
|    21 Mar 25 23:14:01    |
      [continued from previous message]              Some still defend the use of "Angmar" as a convenient nickname, but as       others find this irritating it is probably best avoided.       -------              13. What was Gothmog (the lieutenant of Morgul)?               Gothmog (who shares his name with the Lord of Balrogs in the First       Age) took command of Sauron's forces after the Witch-king was       destroyed. Some believe that like the Mouth of Sauron he was human,       while others claim that so responsible a position in Minas Morgul would       only be given to another Nazgul. Several other possibilities also       arise repeatedly. There seems to be no explicit evidence for any       particular answer.       -------              14. What was the origin of Orcs?              [This updates question V.G.1 of the Tolkien LessFAQ.]               Tolkien never seems to have firmly resolved this question in his own       mind, let alone on paper. While /The Silmarillion/ as published states       fairly clearly that Orcs were corrupted Elves, /Unfinished Tales/ hints       that some strains of Orcs may have been bred from the Druedain.       Tolkien's latest writings on the issue (found in Texts VIII-X of the       "Myths Transformed" section in /Morgoth's Ring/) show him considering       many possible origins: corrupted Elves, corrupted Men, very minor Maiar       (a small number of original Orcish leaders only), or even beasts given       fragments of Morgoth's own will so they would have some measure of       independence. Some combination of these origins seems most likely from       the texts, though the last of them was probably rejected.               All of these suggested origins still support the notion that Orcs       reproduced in the same manner as other races (and therefore that there       were female Orcs). This is explicitly discussed in Text X of "Myths       Transformed", which states that               Men could under the domination of Morgoth or his agents in a few        generations be reduced almost to the Orc-level of mind and habits;        and then they would or could be made to mate with Orcs, producing        new breeds, often larger and more cunning.              The role of female Orcs in their society is not at all clear.       -------              15. Were Orcs immortal, and what happened to them after death?               Given that Tolkien never firmly decided on the origin of Orcs (as       discussed in question III.B.14), it is unsurprising that little is       known about their fate. It seems clear that creatures descended even       in part from humans would be mortal (as the Princes of Dol Amroth were;       Elrond and his kin were special exceptions). In one his many       conflicting essays about Orcs (Text X of "Myths Transformed" in       /Morgoth's Ring/), Tolkien does give a direct answer to these       questions:               They could be slain, and they were subject to disease; but apart        from these ills they died and were not immortal, even according to        the manner of the Quendi; indeed they appear to have been by nature        short-lived compared with the span of Men of higher race, such as        the Edain.              The apparent clarity of this statement may be misleading, considering       the frequency with which Tolkien made and contradicted assertions about       Orcs in the "Myths Transformed" texts.               There are several reasons to believe that at least some Orcs had       very long lives. One of the strongest is based on the death dates of       the Orc Azog and his son Bolg. Azog was killed at the Battle of       Azanulbizar in 2799, while Bolg was killed at the Battle of Five Armies       in 2941. Thus, Bolg was still alive and strong over 140 years after       his conception.               More circumstantial evidence can be found in "The Choices of Master       Samwise", when Sam overhears Gorbag speaking to Shagrat:               '...if we get a chance, you and me'll slip off and set up somewhere        on our own... somewhere where there's good loot nice and handy, and        no big bosses.'               'Ah!' said Shagrat. 'Like old times.'              At this time, Sauron had been openly ruling Mordor for sixty-eight       years, but Shagrat and Gorbag seem to recall a time when he wasn't in       charge. This could mean that they were over seventy years old, that it       took Sauron many years to establish firm control over his minions, or       that they heard stories of "old times" from their elders.               Gorbag also makes reference to "the Great Siege", which might refer       either to the siege of the Last Alliance on Mordor or to the siege of       Angband in the First Age, but it is less clear that he actually       remembers it. Similarly, the goblins who captured Bilbo and Thorin in       /The Hobbit/ had a surprisingly clear memory of the swords from       Gondolin that they called "Beater and Biter", but there are       explanations for that other than personal experience.               As for their fate after death, this would depend very much on their       origins (again, refer to question III.B.14). Beasts would presumably       not /have/ a fate after death, and it seems likely that creatures       descended even in part from Men would share their Gift and leave the       world. Near the end of Text VIII of "Myths Transformed", Tolkien       comments that if there were an Elvish strain among Orcs, "dying they       would go to Mandos and be held in prison till the End." It also seems       possible that Orcish spirits would refuse the summons to Mandos, as       discussed in question III.B.6 of this FAQ; it is even conceivable that       they could be reborn or re-embodied if they then returned to Morgoth or       Sauron.       -------              16. What was the relationship between Orcs and Goblins?              [This supplements question V.F.1 of the Tolkien FAQ.]               The words "Orc" and "Goblin" are essentially identical in meaning,       but Tolkien's inconsistent usage in /The Hobbit/ has led to       considerable confusion. Still, a clear answer comes from Tolkien's       introductory note to later editions of that book, which explains that               /Orc/ is not an English word. It occurs in one or two places but is        usually translated /goblin/ (or /hobgoblin/ for the larger kinds).        /Orc/ is the hobbits' form of the name given at that time to these        creatures.              Some have taken this and other comments in /The Hobbit/ (such as the       reference to "the big ones, the orcs of the mountains" near the end of       "Riddles in the Dark") to mean that "Goblins" were smaller and "Orcs"       larger. However, Tolkien did not generally make this distinction. For       instance, the name /Orcrist/ is translated "Goblin-cleaver" in all       editions of /The Hobbit/. Another clear example comes from the chapter       "The Riders of Rohan" in LotR, when the companions reach the edge of       Fangorn:               Upon a stake in the middle was set a great goblin head; upon its        shattered helm the white badge could still be seen.              The white badge makes it all but certain that this was one of the large       Uruk-hai. In fact, it seems plausible that this was the head of Ugluk       himself, slain after a climactic fight sword to sword with Eomer at the       end of the battle. If one of the Uruk-hai could be called a goblin,       any Orc could.       -------              17. What was the origin of Saruman's Uruk-hai?               Whatever the details of their origins, all evidence indicates that       like all Orcs, Saruman's Uruk-hai were bred "naturally" by mating       humanoid creatures who then bore live young. The real questions are       whether it was Sauron or Saruman who planned that breeding, and what       stock they were bred from.               It is important that the meaning of "Uruk-hai" be clear from the       start. Appendix F says that "the word /uruk/ of the Black Speech...       was applied as a rule only to the great soldier-orcs that at this time       issued from Mordor and Isengard." As for the plural, the index of              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca