From: yrol@yrol.invalid   
      
   On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:12:37 GMT, "marianne casper"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Well, I think of Before Sunset as a chick flick.   
      
   ?   
      
   >In fact I heard a male   
   >Blockbuster employee try to talk a woman out of renting it. Of course I had   
   >to intervene! Yes, I do think taste is subjective. I also think Blockbuster   
   >employees shouldn't try to talk customers out of renting movies. Were I the   
   >manager that little incident would have prompted a meeting.   
   >I didn't like Sideways, but that's just me. It sure seems like everybody   
   >else liked it. The story was what I didn't like, not the acting.   
      
   The taste is not subjective because even what you have just said is   
   relativized, therefore subjective and so...   
      
   You say subjective but you put this opinion like objective : taste is   
   subjective. Very contradictory. This position is not bearable. To say that   
   the taste is subjective is very in the mood. How to understand the lie and   
   the illusions then?  How to make the difference between what is real and   
   unreal ?   
      
   In addition, this subjectivist denies the contribution of the other and is   
   contained on its ego, on its feelings. How you consider the taste of madman   
   or of a neurotic?   
      
      
   --   
   Yannick Rolandeau   
   http://yrol.free.fr/   
   « Je suis homme et rien de ce qui est humain ne m'est étranger. »   
                                    Terence   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)