From: yrol@yrol.invalid
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:43:17 -0400, "Marc-Olivier Girard"
wrote:
>Quite frankly, for regular WA viewers, Melinda has not very much to offer.
>Another boring rehash of things seen a million time already. The screenplay
>is not well inspired and was another pretext to make another 100-minute
>movie. The comedy part is not that funny and the dramatic one is too
>dramatic to be credible.
If people say that WA is not renewed, the critics relating to his movies
are not renewed more. We could say the same thing of Bergman, Chaplin etc.
It's not a criticism but an established fact that each great director
always make same film. They are repeated and it is useless to focus on the
repetition but on what is contained in the film which remains always lucid,
shining, light and deep.
Finally, people ask WA to be always new, brilliant, and that he not be
almost any more WA but Stanley Kubrick. Finally, the report that I do is
which people quite simply weary of what they loved. And that what they
liked, they is unable to like it in time with same constancy. This idea of
repetition has to see much with the cinema of WA itself. In particular in
the love.
I think about Before sunrise when Julie Delpy says :
"When you talked earlier about after a few years how a couple would begin
to hate each other by anticipating their reactions or getting tired
of their mannerisms. I think it would be the opposite for me. I think I can
really fall in love when I know everything about someone. The way he's
gonna part his hair which shirt he's gonna wear that day... knowing the
exact story he'd tell in a given situation. I'm sure that's when I know
I'm really in love."
--
Yannick Rolandeau
http://yrol.free.fr/
« Je suis homme et rien de ce qui est humain ne m'est étranger. »
Terence
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
