home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.fan.woody-allen      A terrific babysitter for teen girls      664 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 487 of 664   
   Classic Collector to John Harkness   
   Re: Small Time Crooks (2000)   
   13 May 05 15:15:54   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.movies.past-films   
   From: nospam@nospam.net   
      
   Old - check   
   Stupid - check   
      
      
   "John Harkness"  wrote in message   
   news:2lj7819t10ktufgijc6ivr3n5na5h94sdr@4ax.com...   
   > On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:19:07 -0400, "Classic Collector"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >The only people who think Woody Allen's newest movies are so bad, are   
   older   
   > >fans of Woody Allen. If you look at imdb.com, at the various reviews,   
   you'll   
   > >see a breakdown based on age. Younger viewers (18-29 or so) rated movies   
   > >like Anything Else, Melinda and Melinda, and Small Time Crooks much   
   higher   
   > >than people in their 40's and 50's.   
   > >   
   > >I'm 28, and love Anything Else, Melinda nad Melinda, Small Time Crooks,   
   etc.   
   > >I think you've got to be crazy if you think Woody is washed up. What   
   films   
   > >are you seeing? Hitch? House of Wax? Critics love to bash Woody because   
   > >well, he's a genius, and has lived a "controversial love life." Like your   
   > >favorite mainstream stars aren't out there doing crazy shit? I'll tell   
   ya,   
   > >most people are clueless.   
   >   
   > Nah. We love to bash Woody because we remember when he was a working   
   > genius rather than a former genius.   
   >   
   > Don't much care about his love life, myself.   
   >   
   > John Harkness   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca