XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
       Anyone who's able to think about it realistically is able to comprehend   
   that   
   if there really was no evidence at all of God's existence, the concept wouldn't   
   even exist much less would billions of people believe there's a God associated   
   with this planet. It would necessarily require a very stupid person to be   
   unable   
   to comprehend and appreciate something so obvious since there would be nothing   
   TO believe in. That's one of the basic starting lines atheists can't get as   
   "far" as. It's possible that there is no God associated with Earth and if so   
   then all evidence is false evidence, and all beliefs about his existence are   
   incorrect. However it's also possible that there is a God associated with Earth   
   which is another one of the basic starting lines that atheists can't get as   
   "far" as. If there is then some of the evidence is good evidence even though no   
   doubt there is still plenty of false evidence as well, which is yet another   
   basic starting line atheists can't get as "far" as. We're all aware that   
   atheists deny any evidence of God's existence, and some of us are aware of the   
   blatant dishonesty associated with such claims. In some cases the people might   
   actually be stupid enough to believe themselves, but in others I can't help but   
   feel that they're not honestly as stupid as believing themselves would require   
   them to be.   
      
       From their own demands for evidence that God exists atheists SHOW US they   
   believe somehow there "should be" verifiable evidence of his existence if God   
   does exist. How stupid would they have to be to demand verifiable evidence of   
   it   
   if they didn't believe there "should be" some if he does exist? How stupid   
   would   
   they have to be to demand it if they didn't think it "should be" somehow   
   available to humans if he does exist? EXTREMELY STUPID of course, since they're   
   trying to use the lack of it as an argument that God does not exist. However,   
   even though they feel that there "should be" evidence available if God does   
   exist, none of them have any idea of what it should be, where it should be, or   
   why it should be there. The reason why they are so helplessly clueless, is   
   because there's NO REASON why there "should be" verifiable evidence of any   
   types   
   if God exists. What evidence is there that anything existed in the past? Should   
   there be fossils of God? Should his DNA somehow be available somewhere? Should   
   his bones have been found in a tomb someplace? No to all those things, and no   
   one can suggest anything else there "should be" either. What we COULD expect to   
   see is the evidence we DO HAVE. We have writings carved in stone. We have   
   ancient temples, and ruins of temples with elaborate carvings in stone. We have   
   written accounts of miracles performed when God did interact with humans, and   
   we   
   still have the results of those acts influencing people today. We still have   
   current examples of apparent miracles of various types including apparent   
   medical miracles still happening in current times. And the fact that atheists   
   can't appreciate any of these things IS EVIDENCE of Satan influencing human   
   minds. So not only do we have the evidence from ancient history but we also   
   have   
   current evidence going on right in front of us right now, and of course all   
   that   
   has happened between now and ancient times. And as we saw above, the reason   
   atheists are clueless about what sort of verifiable evidence there "should be"   
   if God exists is that there's NO REASON why there "should be" any at all.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)