XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, Sylvia Else    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >On 1/11/2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   existence,   
   >> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   >> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is evidence,   
   >   
   >Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?   
      
       Why don't you do it, so we can see if you're aware of at least that much?   
   I'd also invite you to let us know what evidence you think there should be if   
   God exists, but by now we've learned that you haven't got the slightest clue   
   about that. You seem to think some should exist for some reason you can't   
   explain, yet you have no clue what it should be, where it should be, or why it   
   should be available to humans at all. Can you not appreciate how idiotic it is   
   for anyone to be in the position you're in, when just describing it is   
   hilarious?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)