XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 04-November-2014 11:35 AM, mur.@.not. wrote:   
      
   > On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 10:53:11 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   > ..   
   >> On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared   
   >> in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else   
   >> :   
   >>   
   >>> On 1/11/2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >>>> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   existence,   
   >>>> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   >>>> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is   
   evidence,   
   >>> Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?   
   >> Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of   
   >> religious texts, number of believers and arguments from   
   >> incredulity?   
   >      What do you think there should be? Why can't you people give respectable   
   > examples of what type(s) of evidence you think there should be in addition to   
   > the evidence you deny? Why can't you say where it should be? Why can't you   
   > explain why it should be available to humans? Why can't you say why you can't   
   > say, even after it has been explained for you? The answer is that you're   
   ashamed   
   > of your failings as you should be, and you're ashamed of your shame, as again   
   > you should be. ALL OF YOU!   
      
   asking for physical evidence of non-physical entities is like asking   
   physical entities to behave like gods   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The right to free speech includes the right to offend"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)