XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cbr8mbFmnh1U2@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 04-November-2014 10:32 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >   
   > > "Bob Casanova" skrev i meddelelsen   
   > > news:oprc5a1ito4taguc3j971q5e913bi0ic3l@4ax.com...   
   > >>   
   > >> On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared   
   > >> in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else   
   > >> :   
   > >>   
   > >> >On 1/11/2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> >> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of   
   > >> God's >> existence,   
   > >> >> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented   
   > >> with >> evidence   
   > >> >> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is   
   > >> >> evidence,   
   > >>   
   > >> >Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been   
   > >> presented?   
   > >>   
   > >> Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of   
   > >> religious texts, number of believers and arguments from   
   > >> incredulity?   
   > >   
   > > Don't forget the 'many documented miracles'.   
   > >   
   >   
   > yes   
      
   Then name one. Don' give me a google search, 'miracles happen', and let me   
   sift through the millions of hits. No, you find me a specific example of an   
   incident that defies natural laws and can only be explained by devine   
   intervention (or an example of what you classify as a miracle). Go:   
      
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)