XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cbsvbqF6lrmU1@mid.individual.net...   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > and ppl believe that there may be a Loch Ness Monster, and UFO's exist,   
   > because of the evidence for them. what is so difficult about this?   
      
   I'll stick to 'the blob in sky in the photo' example. It can be interpreted   
   as evidence of a million different things. UFO's, dust on the lense, Belgian   
   helicopter crashing, an eagle. A ghost! If it is possible evidence of   
   anything, it's not evidence at all. Even if it turns out, by some other   
   means, that the photo contains the image of a UFO, it still isn't evidence   
   of the UFO.   
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)