XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cbt5gkF875oU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 05-November-2014 9:50 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   > > "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen   
   > > news:cbsvbqF6lrmU1@mid.individual.net...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 05-November-2014 8:05 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> > "August Rode" skrev i meddelelsen >   
   > >> news:Cg46w.212725$Lq6.152240@fx29.iad...   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> On 04/11/2014 7:28 AM, felix_unger wrote:   
   > >> >> > On 04-November-2014 10:12 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> On 4/11/2014 9:58 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >>> not when there are literally billions of people who consider   
   > >> >> >>> they   
   > >> >> have   
   > >> >> >>> good reason(s) to believe. only ppl who want to deny the   
   > >> >> existence of   
   > >> >> >>> God try to claim that no evidence of God exists.   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> That they believe is only evidence of their belief. It isn't >>   
   > >> >> evidence   
   > >> >> >> of the correctness of their belief.   
   > >> >> >   
   > >> >> > belief isn't evidence of belief. it's evidence for what is   
   > >> >> > believed   
   > >> >> in.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Millions of children believe in Santa Claus. Do you accept that as   
   > >> >> evidence that Santa exists?   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Santa? Phew! Kids' stuff. No, my good man, let's see if you can >   
   > >> 'out-absurd'   
   > >> > me. I gave him the stories about Dog Heads, and yup: The stories are   
   > >> > evidence for the existence of Dog Heads. People wouldn't believe in   
   > >> > something if there was no evidence, would they!   
   > >>   
   > >> ppl believe because of the evidence   
   > >>   
   > >> > Your turn (FYI Nessie, Potter and UFO's have all been done):   
   > >> >   
   > >> >   
   > >>   
   > >> and ppl believe that there may be a Loch Ness Monster, and UFO's exist,   
   > >> because of the evidence for them. what is so difficult about this?   
   > >   
   > > Is a photo of an empty sky evidence of the existence of invisible UFO's?   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   > no. ...   
      
   Of course not. Good. I found your limit.   
      
   > ... but your posts are evidence that you have no common sense.   
      
   At least I don't believe in invisible gods and ditto UFO's.   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)