XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cbt5i4F875oU2@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 05-November-2014 9:34 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >   
   > > "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen   
   > > news:cbsvbqF6lrmU1@mid.individual.net...   
   > >   
   > > (snip)   
   > >   
   > >> and ppl believe that there may be a Loch Ness Monster, and UFO's exist,   
   > >> because of the evidence for them. what is so difficult about this?   
   > >   
   > > I'll stick to 'the blob in sky in the photo' example. It can be   
   > > interpreted as evidence of a million different things. UFO's, dust on   
   > > the lense, Belgian helicopter crashing, an eagle. A ghost! If it is   
   > > possible evidence of anything, it's not evidence at all. Even if it   
   > > turns out, by some other means, that the photo contains the image of a   
   > > UFO, it still isn't evidence of the UFO.   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   > you're wrong! ...   
      
   Where? About what? That a blob that can be everything, cannot be evidence of   
   anything?   
      
      
   > ... and a bit crazy!   
      
   And you're answering way too fast. Think it through, at least.   
      
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)