XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:52:07 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:35:31 -0500, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 10:53:11 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, the following appeared   
   >>>in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else   
   >>>:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On 1/11/2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   existence,   
   >>>>> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   >>>>> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is   
   evidence,   
   >>>   
   >>>>Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?   
   >>>   
   >>>Any bets on whether it consists of a combination of   
   >>>religious texts, number of believers and arguments from   
   >>>incredulity?   
   >>   
   >>    What do you think there should be? Why can't you people give respectable   
   >>examples of what type(s) of evidence you think there should be in addition to   
   >>the evidence you deny? Why can't you say where it should be? Why can't you   
   >>explain why it should be available to humans? Why can't you say why you can't   
   >>say, even after it has been explained for you? The answer is that you're   
   ashamed   
   >>of your failings as you should be, and you're ashamed of your shame, as again   
   >>you should be. ALL OF YOU!   
   >   
   >You never offered any evidence at all.   
      
       That's a blatant lie. By telling such blatant lies YOU YOURSELF are more   
   evidence, as I feel sure I've pointed out for you in the past.   
      
   >Don't make excuses for your dishonesty.   
      
       I didn't make anything that even appears to be an excuse for anything, so   
   again you're the one being dishonest. What I DID DO was to challenge you with   
   things that defeated you and always do defeat ALL OF YOU so absolutely and   
   entirely that you can't even attempt to meet the challenges, much less overcome   
   them. AGAIN you have shown me to be correct, and you have shown that you are   
   ashamed of your failings as I correctly pointed out.   
      
                                                       BUT!!!!!!   
      
       Those challenges still remain. So you still have a chance to try providing   
   evidence that something I pointed out might not be entirely correct, and that   
   you might be able to address one or more of the challenges that so far have   
   defeated you entirely. This goes for ALL OF YOU!!! The challenges still remain   
   open for ANY OF YOU to try to address and overcome.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)