XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:56:10 +1100, Sylvia Else    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:35:26 -0500, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:32:20 +1100, Sylvia Else    
   >>wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On 1/11/2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >>>> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   existence,   
   >>>> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   >>>> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is   
   evidence,   
   >>>   
   >>>Care to list what you consider to be the evidence that's been presented?   
   >>   
   >>    Why don't you do it, so we can see if you're aware of at least that much?   
   >>I'd also invite you to let us know what evidence you think there should be if   
   >>God exists, but by now we've learned that you haven't got the slightest clue   
   >>about that. You seem to think some should exist for some reason you can't   
   >>explain, yet you have no clue what it should be, where it should be, or why   
   it   
   >>should be available to humans at all. Can you not appreciate how idiotic it   
   is   
   >>for anyone to be in the position you're in, when just describing it is   
   >>hilarious?   
   >   
   >The stuff I'm aware of pretty much matches the categories given by Bob,   
   >and isn't real evidence.   
   >   
   >So, do you have anything else?   
      
       Do I have more than there is? No. YOU still need to explain what more you   
   think there should be, where you think it should be, and why you think it   
   should   
   be available if God exists. But you can't. The reason you can't is because   
   there's no reason why what you demand should be available to humans, and you've   
   proven that you can't even pretend it should. Unless you think you've finally   
   figured out some way to pretend there is, and if you think you have then   
   PRESENT   
   IT ALREADY! I've been directly challenging all of you people on this for months   
   now and none of you have the slightest clue what you think you're trying to   
   demand even as you continue to demand it. Are you honestly unaware of what a   
   remarkably stupid position it is that you're in by doing that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)