XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 23:34:12 +0100, Chicken Runz squawked::   
   .   
   >"felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cbsvbqF6lrmU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   >(snip)   
   >   
   >> and ppl believe that there may be a Loch Ness Monster, and UFO's exist,   
   >> because of the evidence for them. what is so difficult about this?   
   >   
   >I'll stick to 'the blob in sky in the photo' example. It can be interpreted   
   >as evidence of a million different things. UFO's, dust on the lense, Belgian   
   >helicopter crashing, an eagle. A ghost! If it is possible evidence of   
   >anything, it's not evidence at all. Even if it turns out, by some other   
   >means, that the photo contains the image of a UFO, it still isn't evidence   
   >of the UFO.   
      
       LOL!!! Hilarious!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)