XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:46:46 -0500, mur.@.not. wrote:   
      
   >On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:43:50 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >.   
   >>On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:35:17 -0500, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 09:11:56 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >>>.   
   >>>>On 01-November-2014 7:05 AM, The.W@tcher wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> For years atheists have demanded what they call "evidence" of God's   
   existence,   
   >>>>> when what they really have been demanding is proof. When presented with   
   evidence   
   >>>>> of various types they dishonestly have denied the fact that it is   
   evidence,   
   >>>>> enjoying the luxury of indulging themselves in their own blatant   
   dishonesty.   
   >>>>> Their constant demand for proof which they dishonestly refer to as   
   evidence   
   >>>>> makes it clear that they believe there should be some sort of proof of   
   God's   
   >>>>> existence available to humans if he does indeed exist.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>true!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> In the not too distant past atheists in these news groups have   
   experienced their   
   >>>>> complete and total ruination which they encountered due to the challenge   
   >>>>> presented to them by mur@.not The challenge was a simple one that they   
   should be   
   >>>>> able to address and overcome with ease, yet in reality none of them could   
   >>>>> address it at all much less overcome it. The challenge that defeated   
   them so   
   >>>>> entirely was simply for them to try to explain what sort of "evidence"   
   they   
   >>>>> think there should be, where they think it should be, and why they think   
   God   
   >>>>> should make it available to humans if he does exist. That simple   
   challenge   
   >>>>> resulted in their total ruination by exposing the fact that they don't   
   have the   
   >>>>> slightest idea what sort of proof God should provide us with, much less   
   where he   
   >>>>> should make it available. In the related followup thread "Why atheists   
   are   
   >>>>> clueless about the evidence aspect." the resulting exposure of their   
   >>>>> cluelessness is examined and it's made clear that no one including the   
   atheists   
   >>>>> themselves can suggest why any such proof should be available to humans.   
   That   
   >>>>> failure makes it clear that they have been extreme fools all these years   
   for   
   >>>>> demanding something we now see there's no reason should be available for   
   them to   
   >>>>> be presented with.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>yes, they cannot explain why there should be any proof   
   >>>   
   >>>    Apparently they can't even make an attempt. They've certainly shown that   
   >>>they don't have any idea what they thought they were trying to talk about.   
   It   
   >>>seems that they're now aware of their position since they don't try to   
   defend   
   >>>themselves or their positon any more.   
   >>   
   >>Go preach your religious nonsense elsewhere. You both know that you have   
   >>no evidence to support any claims about gods.   
   >   
   >    You blatantly lie that there's no evidence even though we ONLY have   
   evidence   
   >that God does exist, and there is NO evidence he does not.   
      
   You _know_ that you have no evidence. You know it and lie about it. You   
   invent a god that you need to lie about. What a pitiable creature you   
   are.   
      
   >You make it clear you   
   >will not refer to the evidence that exists as evidence.   
      
   I will accept all evidence. I will not accept your intentional false   
   claims because we both know they are not evidence.   
      
   >You make it clear that   
   >you believe if God does exist, that YOU believe there should be stronger   
   >evidence of his existence. YOU make it clear you believe that if God does   
   exist   
   >there should be some sort of proof that he exists, yet you lie about that. So   
   >you lie that there is no evidence, you lie that you think there should be   
   proof   
   >of it if God does exist, but you don't have the slightest clue what sort of   
   >proof you think there should be, or where you think it should be, or why you   
   >think it should be available to humans. THAT is the amusing though pathetic   
   >position you and your fellow atheists ARE IN. You are also in the position of   
   >being ashamed of being in that position and wanting to deny it, though you   
   will   
   >almost certainly never make any attempt to move out of that position you're   
   >ashamed of being in. LOL!!! Again just describing the position you people are   
   in   
   >is HILARIOUS!   
      
   You worship the lies you tell, nothing else.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)