XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:18:35 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   .   
   >On 12-November-2014 11:00 AM, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:52:54 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >> ..   
   >>> On 07-November-2014 5:47 AM, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 23:34:12 +0100, Chicken Runz squawked::   
   >>>> ..   
   >>>>> "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cbsvbqF6lrmU1@mid.   
   ndividual.net...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> (snip)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> and ppl believe that there may be a Loch Ness Monster, and UFO's exist,   
   >>>>>> because of the evidence for them. what is so difficult about this?   
   >>>>> I'll stick to 'the blob in sky in the photo' example. It can be   
   interpreted   
   >>>>> as evidence of a million different things. UFO's, dust on the lense,   
   Belgian   
   >>>>> helicopter crashing, an eagle. A ghost! If it is possible evidence of   
   >>>>> anything, it's not evidence at all. Even if it turns out, by some other   
   >>>>> means, that the photo contains the image of a UFO, it still isn't   
   evidence   
   >>>>> of the UFO.   
   >>>>       LOL!!! Hilarious!   
   >>> he's showing how ridiculous he is. not an ounce of common sense!   
   >>      I'm glad you have come to the same conclusion. It seems that in the   
   past you   
   >> had a higher opinion of the cowardly idiot....much higher than he deserves.   
   >   
   >I did   
      
       It may be that he makes some attempt not to be an ass, but just can't help   
   resorting to lying and asshole behavior eventually. From my pov that seems to   
   be   
   the case with all of them, though some don't seem to make any attempt to ever   
   avoid being asses.   
      
   >> Maybe like myself you tend to overestimate people?   
   >   
   >I think I must do. I know I always tend to assume that ppl are acting   
   >with honourable intent, and forget that some ppl are just arseholes!   
   >   
   >>   Even after I've learned to   
   >> think of someone as little better than a moron I STILL tend to overestimate   
   them   
   >> from time to time.   
   >   
   >that's because you're good hearted and don't like to think badly of others   
      
       Thanks. You seem to be that way as well. The same can't be said of any of   
   the atheists though afaik. But what else can we expect from people whose entire   
   position seems to be built on blatant dishonesty from the ground up? People who   
   are so comfortable with lying that the truth often seems incomprehensible to   
   them? People who can't even get to a number of basic starting lines in regards   
   to a topic they like to consider themselves authorities on? And who appear to   
   WANT TO be in the position they're in?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)