home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.jesus.christ      But... wasn't he a carpenter?      88,286 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 86,459 of 88,286   
   felix_unger to August Rode   
   Re: Undeniable ruination of news group a   
   16 Nov 14 08:43:25   
   
   XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 16-November-2014 12:31 AM, August Rode wrote:   
      
   > On 15/11/2014 7:52 AM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >> On 15-November-2014 2:36 PM, August Rode wrote:   
   >>> On 14/11/2014 9:28 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>>> On 15-November-2014 9:16 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>    
   >>>   
   >>>> the reports of miracles are evidence for miracles, whether a miracle   
   >>>> happened or not.   
   >>>   
   >>> How can a report of a miracle be evidence for that miracle if that   
   >>> miracle didn't happen?   
   >>   
   >> In the same way that a report of a UFO sighting is evidence for the   
   >> existence of UFO's whether they exist or not.   
   >   
   > One *cannot* have evidence for the existence of something that does   
   > not exist. One can *imagine* or *pretend* that one has evidence for   
   > the existence of something that one believes exists (but doesn't   
   > really exist) but that's as far as it goes.   
      
   actually, because this matter of evidence for the existence of God has   
   been an ongoing discussion for some time, with it's associated dispute   
   over the meaning of evidence, I created a web page listing definitions   
   of evidence from several sources, viz:   
      
   http://ausnet.info/evidence   
      
   please note the following references-   
      
   E1.1   
   E1.2   
   E2.1   
   E2.2   
   E2.7   
   E3.1   
   E3.1.2   
   E4.1   
   E5   
      
   >   
   >>> You're talking high-grade nonsense. Nothing new there.   
   >>>   
   >>>    
   >>   
   >> atheists failing to understand the most basic things. nothing new there.   
   >   
   > I understand what evidence is. You don't seem to have the first clue.   
   >   
      
   on the contrary, it seems I do. clueless atheists are the ones without   
   the first clue.   
      
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The right to free speech includes the right to offend"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca