XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 07:49:41 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   .   
   >On 22-November-2014 1:28 PM, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:16:27 +0100, Chicken Runz wrote:   
   >> ..   
   >>> "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:ccq1s3Fj47oU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>>> On 16-November-2014 12:21 AM, Chicken Runz wrote:   
   >>>>> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen   
   >>>>> news:ccns2oF1jdgU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>> (snip)   
   >>>   
   >>> For a while I thought fuck it, this is getting tiresome, and he'll call a   
   >>> blob 'evidence of alien UFO's' no matter what. 'A miracle is evidence of   
   God   
   >>> even if we know that the miracle never happened.'   
   >>>   
   >>> But then I got pissed off again. That little piece of shite had actually   
   >>> said this:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>> ... like the fact that you lie ...   
   >>> You said that it is a fact that I'm a liar,   
   >>      Because you're a liar.   
   >>   
   >>> but you refused to back it up.   
   >>> If it's "a fact" then you can prove it, right,   
   >>      I can:   
   >>   
   >> "I showed an example of evidence that proves god does not exist." - Malte   
   Runz   
   >>   
   >>> but you didn't even try. You   
   >>> know what that makes you?   
   >>>   
   >>> You also said this about me:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>> make contradictory remarks about what you yourself believe ...   
   >>> Again, you failed to back it up, which would be the easiest thing in the   
   >>> world. Quote me, and make me look bad.   
   >>      You like to pretend you can consider this possibility which you've   
   proven   
   >> that you can't:   
   >>   
   >> "Don't you read what I actually write? God as an alien is NOT a new concept   
   >> to me. It's roughly 40 years since I first heard of Erich van Dänekin and   
   >> all that crap. Don't think you're ahead of me in that department." - Malte   
   Runz   
   >>   
   >> You've also claimed:   
   >>   
   >> "Aaaaarrrrghhhhh! I have written, at least ten times, in various posts, that   
   >> I believe it is likely that there are very, very advanced creatures in the   
   >> universe with abilities that would seem miraculous and god-like to us. The   
   >> idea is not new to me. Why the hell do you claim that I believe the exact   
   >> opposite?" - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >> yet you have never been able to explain how you want people to think you   
   think   
   >> you disagree with yourself:   
   >>   
   >> "the utter lack of evidence is enough for me to believe that there are no   
   gods.   
   >> Anywhere, anywhen." - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >> "How many times do I need to write: "I believe no gods exist"" - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >> You also dishonestly pretended you could appreciate the possibility of God   
   being   
   >> a very advanced creature, but also showed that in reality the possibility is   
   >> beyond your mental ability and you can't even think it through:   
   >>   
   >> "I must insist that you distinguish between Biblical God and   
   >> Advanced Alien God." - Malte Runz   
   >> .. . .   
   >>> I could go into further details about all   
   >>> the questions and replies that you have ignored.   
   >>      You've been challenged countless times to provide evidence that you   
   didn't   
   >> lie blatantly when you claimed:   
   >>   
   >> "I showed an example of evidence that proves god does not exist." - Malte   
   Runz   
   >>   
   >> And ALL OF YOU have been challenged to try explaining WHAT evidence you   
   think   
   >> should be WHERE and WHY it should be available to humans when you make   
   claims   
   >> like:   
   >>   
   >> "If a god could interact with the physical world, there should be   
   >> physical evidence thereof." - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >> yet NONE OF YOU can even attempt to explain what you think you think.   
   >>   
   >>> But knowing you, as the   
   >>> intellectual lazy coward you are, I realize that it'll yield nothing.   
   >>      Knowing the same is most especially true of you I still continue to   
   present   
   >> challenges that defeat you entirely and continue proving you to be a   
   horribly   
   >> inept lazy coward yourself.   
   >>   
   >>>> I do appreciate your input, ...   
   >>> And a slimy hypocrite as well.   
   >>      You're certainly displaying yourself as one.   
   >>   
   >>> Damn, I'm feeling a whole lot better now.   
   >>      LOL...there's no reason why you should.   
   >>   
   >>> Have a really shitty weekend!   
   >>      You have an even worse one, Chicken. You deserve it.   
   >   
   >many thanks. I knew you could back up what I said. :)   
      
       My pleasure.  Few are as worthy of being challenged on their own dishonesty   
   and self-disagreement as Chicken is.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)