XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 10:22:38 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   .   
   >On 25-November-2014 11:03 AM, Chicken wrote:   
   >   
   >> "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> news:cdhjvaFntp3U1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>>   
   >> (loads of snippage)   
   >>   
   >>> > "I showed an example of evidence that proves god does not exist." -   
   >>> > Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >>> > "Don't you read what I actually write? God as an alien is NOT a new   
   >>> > concept   
   >>> > to me. It's roughly 40 years since I first heard of Erich van   
   >>> Dänekin > and   
   >>> > all that crap. Don't think you're ahead of me in that department."   
   >>> - > Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >>> > "Aaaaarrrrghhhhh! I have written, at least ten times, in various   
   >>> posts, > that   
   >>> > I believe it is likely that there are very, very advanced creatures   
   >>> in > the   
   >>> > universe with abilities that would seem miraculous and god-like to   
   >>> us. > The   
   >>> > idea is not new to me. Why the hell do you claim that I believe the   
   >>> > exact   
   >>> > opposite?" - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >>> > "the utter lack of evidence is enough for me to believe that there   
   >>> are > no gods.   
   >>> > Anywhere, anywhen." - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >>> > "How many times do I need to write: "I believe no gods exist"" -   
   >>> Malte > Runz   
   >>   
   >>> > "I must insist that you distinguish between Biblical God and   
   >>> > Advanced Alien God." - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >>> > "I showed an example of evidence that proves god does not exist." -   
   >>> > Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >>> > "If a god could interact with the physical world, there should be   
   >>> > physical evidence thereof." - Malte Runz   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> many thanks. I knew you could back up what I said. :)   
   >>   
   >> Well, that's a really nice collection of quotes your pet idiot keeps.   
   >   
   >atheists are such miserable people, they hate to think that others can   
   >be happy and have some connection or agreement with others, so they need   
   >to deride it   
   >   
   >> He must have a lot a free time on his hands. But where is the lie   
   >   
   >I already told you that I don't recall what I had in mind specifically   
   >when I said that, and even withdrew it to make you happy,   
      
       So you honestly believe that Chicken "showed an example of evidence that   
   proves god does not exist." Do you have any idea what that example is, or do   
   you   
   just take his word for it that he didn't lie about it? I don't take his word   
   for   
   it, believe that he did lie about it, and have challenged him a number of times   
   to try to provide some evidence that he wasn't lying horribly when he made the   
   claim. He could never attempt to address the challenge, but if you think he   
   didn't lie and think you know what that example was, then I'd like to see you   
   present it even though he could never do it for himself.   
      
   >but since   
   >making atheists happy is a near impossibility, if even possible at all,   
      
       I feel certain you made him very happy by doubting that he lied about that   
   particular horribly dishonest claim. Why else would a person tell such a   
   horribly blatant lie if it wouldn't make them happy if they somehow could get   
   someone to believe they weren't lying? He probably wasn't quite stupid enough   
   to   
   think he ever could get anyone to believe it when he told it to begin with, so   
   you now indicating that you believe he might not have been lying is almost   
   certain to delight him more than he had thought possible when he first told   
   that   
   very stupid lie.   
      
   >you still want to bitch and moan about it   
   >   
   >> and where is the contradiction?   
   >   
   >and I already also said mur had evidence that you contradict yourself   
   >   
   >> Let me guess: 'LOL... Everything you say is evidence that you lie and   
   >> contradict yourself. ROFL LOL!!! My main man mur says so. LOL OMG   
   >> ROFLMAO!!'   
   >   
   >he's da man!..   
   >   
   >>   
   >> The question remains. Do you have the balls to pick one (1) example of   
   >> each from the list above and defend yourself? Of course you don't...   
   >> you never have.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >as I said, I based my remark on the fact that mur said you contradicted   
   >yourself. perhaps that list is incomplete or inconclusive   
      
       May be. I have challenged Chicken a number of times to try to explain how   
   he   
   thinks he disagrees with himself about the following:   
      
   "I believe it is likely that there are very, very advanced creatures in the   
   universe with abilities that would seem miraculous and god-like to us." -   
   Chicken   
      
   "the utter lack of evidence is enough for me to believe that there are no gods.   
   Anywhere, anywhen." - Chicken   
      
   yet he has been unable to make any attempt to explain. Now it appears that you   
   believe he somehow agrees with himself. Maybe you can explain how Chicken feels   
   "it is likely that there are" such beings some place(s) in the universe while   
   at   
   the same time believing that there are none "Anywhere, anywhen." How do you   
   think Chicken believes both of those things at the same time? Or if you think   
   he   
   might not, how do you think he might think he disagrees with himself?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)