XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 30-December-2014 8:11 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   > On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:45:51 +1100, felix_unger    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 30-December-2014 1:03 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:14:50 +1100, felix_unger    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 30-December-2014 7:21 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 07:05:20 +1100, felix_unger    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 30-December-2014 1:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>      If you eager to believe in things with no proof I have some old   
   astrology texts to sell you.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> if astrology is just nonsense, how  do you explain why it's accurate in   
   >>>>>> describing ppl by their star signs?   
   >>>>> Felix how  old are you like 14?   
   >>>> no   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>     Everyone knows that that shit is made   
   >>>>> to be so generic that it can fit anyone. How many zodiacs have you   
   >>>>> read besides your own?   
   >>>> plenty. how many have you read? and Chinese astrology is surprisingly   
   >>>> accurate as well. and then there's numerology.. :)   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Read others you will find that most of them   
   >>>>> will fit you in some way.   
   >>>> yes, 'in some way'. but when the profiles are (significantly) more than   
   >>>> 50% accurate, ie. beyond the law of averages, for each star sign, that's   
   >>>> indicative that there must be reasons for it. and the profiles for each   
   >>>> star sign are significantly different, ie. they are are not just   
   >>>> generically similar.   
   >>> there are no laws of averages when you are talking about generics. it   
   >>> means it will apply to most people. from what you said that would mean   
   >>> that they are 50 % accutate for 100% of the people........   
   >>>   
   >>> do you see the problem I am talking about.   
   >> no I don't. If my star sign is (say) 90% accurate about me, and all the   
   >> other star signs are only (say) 20% accurate about me, then that   
   >> indicates there is some validity to astrology   
   > Well what is it you said 50 the first time????????????????????????   
   > and no it is not 90% for your zodiac.. it is about as you saidf 50%   
   > but you will also fill 50% of most other zodiacs   
      
   your brain is scrambled. must be the atheism..   
      
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   http://www.barenakedislam.com/   
   Brigitte Gabriel's answer to 'peaceful' moslems.. http://tinyurl   
   com/brigitteGab   
   "The right to free speech includes the right to offend"   
   "ISIS's actions represent no faith, least of all the Muslim faith"   
   -Barack Obama, idiotic President of the USA   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)