XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 00:42:15 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:45:42 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:28:47 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>In article ,   
   >>> felix_unger  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> it takes faith to believe that God does not   
   >>>> exist   
   >>>   
   >>>Perhaps it does may faith to disbelieve in what a person has once   
   >>>believed in,   
   >>   
   >>    To disbelieve can mean to have no belief at all, but it can also mean to   
   >>believe something is incorrect. That is very unfortunate imo, and possibly   
   the   
   >>cause of some honest confustion...POSSIBLY.   
   >>   
   >>>but it takes no such faith not to believe in something one   
   >>>never has believed in.   
   >>   
   >>    To honestly have no belief requires considering the possibility that   
   >>something is correct as well as that it's not correct. You make it clearly   
   >>obvious you can consider the possibility that God does not exist as being   
   >>correct. Try to present some evidence that you can also consider the   
   possibility   
   >>that God does exist as being correct, if you really would like to try   
   pretending   
   >>you honestly have no belief about it.   
   >   
   >There are all sorts of things that I have not yet heard about, and   
   >doubtless will not hear about during my lifetime, about which I have no   
   >beliefs whatsoever, having had no opportunity to form any beliefs about   
   >them!   
      
       The possibility of there being a God associated with this planet has   
   nothing   
   to do with what you just wussiley mentioned so what did you think you could   
   gain   
   by such wussing, do you have any idea at all?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)