XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:35:08 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:21:02 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >In article <9o4ldalef6babsqbs25fu0g84am5be4jiv@4ax.com>, mur wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:03:08 -0700, A Nony Mouse  wrote:   
   >> >> .   
   >> >> >On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:29:38 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >>On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:21:33 +0100, "thomas p."    
   >> >> >>wrote:   
   >> >> >>.   
   >> >> >>>"mur" skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> >> >>>news:0qrqcalc1ofgv7gemh395qn40u3tofeiro@4ax.com...   
   >> >> >>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:25:02 -0800, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >> >>>>    
   >> >> >>>> wrote:   
   >> >> >>>> .   
   >> >> >>>>>On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:45:42 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:28:47 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist    
   >> >> >>>>>>wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>>.   
   >> >> >>>>>>>In article ,   
   >> >> >>>>>>> felix_unger  wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>>> it takes faith to believe that God does not   
   >> >> >>>>>>>> exist   
   >> >> >>>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>>Perhaps it does may faith to disbelieve in what a person has once   
   >> >> >>>>>>>believed in,   
   >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>    To disbelieve can mean to have no belief at all, but it can   
   also   
   >> >> >>>>>>    mean   
   >> >> >>>>>> to   
   >> >> >>>>>>believe something is incorrect. That is very unfortunate imo, and   
   >> >> >>>>>>possibly the   
   >> >> >>>>>>cause of some honest confustion...POSSIBLY.   
   >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>>but it takes no such faith not to believe in something one   
   >> >> >>>>>>>never has believed in.   
   >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>    To honestly have no belief requires considering the possibility   
   >> >> >>>>>>    that   
   >> >> >>>>>>something is correct as well as that it's not correct. You make it   
   >> >> >>>>>>clearly   
   >> >> >>>>>>obvious you can consider the possibility that God does not exist as   
   >> >> >>>>>>being   
   >> >> >>>>>>correct. Try to present some evidence that you can also consider   
   the   
   >> >> >>>>>>possibility   
   >> >> >>>>>>that God does exist as being correct, if you really would like to   
   >> >> >>>>>>try   
   >> >> >>>>>>pretending   
   >> >> >>>>>>you honestly have no belief about it.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > If one can believe in the existence of a god without any relevant   
   >> >> >evidence, as so many of those who claim to believe in one do, one can as   
   >> >> >easily fail to believe in the existence of any gods based on an equal   
   >> >> >lack of any relevant evidence.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     If one can only consider the possibility that there's no God   
   >> >>     associated   
   >> >>     with   
   >> >> Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there is, then the person   
   >> >> can   
   >> >> only "have" the one possible belief. All that's in question is why so   
   many   
   >> >> of   
   >> >> you atheists are ashamed of the fact. Why are you, do you have any idea?   
   >> >   
   >> >What the FUCK are you talking about?   
   >>   
   >>     Atheists.   
   >   
   >   
   >Then re-write that paragrah of babble into proper English.   
      
       Try to re-write your demand in English.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)