home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.jesus.christ      But... wasn't he a carpenter?      88,286 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 86,786 of 88,286   
   mur to Free Lunch   
   Re: Undeniable ruination of news group t   
   26 Feb 15 22:50:22   
   
   XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:00:47 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:42:02 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:32:40 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:49:38 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:00:09 -0600, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:52:34 -0700, A Nony Mouse  wrote:   
   >>>...   
   >>>>>>A careful person will not reject the possibility of no gods existing on   
   >>>>>>the basis of any evidence as yet presented, nor reject the reverse   
   >>>>>>possibility on that evidence.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Such careful persons are called agnostics.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Not really. Agnostics say that they do not know and cannot know if any   
   >>>>>deities exist. They may be believers or not be believers.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Do you think there's no distinction between strong and weak agnostics?   
   How   
   >>>>about strong and weak atheists? Your idiot brother bilgat can't comprehend   
   the   
   >>>>distinction between any of them, or even that there is a distinction. Are   
   you as   
   >>>>clueless as that idiot?   
   >>>   
   >>>I have no idea what distinction you imagine exists among agnostics other   
   >>>than belief in god or unbelief, theist or atheist.   
   >>   
   >>    Strong agnostics believe it can't be known whether or not God exists.   
   Weak   
   >>agnostics believe that if God does exist it is possible for some people to   
   know   
   >>it. I'm a weak agnostic and consider strong agnosticism to be even more   
   stupid   
   >>than strong atheism.   
   >   
   >Tell us about the evidence that can be gathered to show that a deity   
   >exists.   
      
       For a person to know it it would be between God and the individual...LOL...   
   It's amusing to think you feel there should be proof for everyone always   
   available. It's like if you think everyone who goes in Walmart should be   
   entitled to get a paycheck even if they don't work there. Hilarious! Not so   
   much   
   that there couldn't be a planet with a God who DOES provide free easy proof for   
   everybody, but since it's obvious that's not the case here it's amusing that   
   you   
   think it should be that way and keep demanding it...LOL... over and over and   
   over again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca