XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:01:25 -0600, A Nony Mouse  wrote:   
   .   
   >In article <1604gad84mqvhkbnqcmqb7e3u1cd71jepb@4ax.com>, mur <> wrote:   
   >   
   >> Your shame of the fact that to honestly have no belief requires considering   
   >> the possibility that something is correct as well as that it's not correct.   
   >   
   >Since I, for one, do not see any absolute evidence either of the   
   >existence of any gods claimed ones or as yet unknown ones or the   
   >nonexistence of all claimed gods or as yet unknown ones, I do not have   
   >any  absolute belief either way.   
   >   
   >But if there should turn out to be any, I strongly suspect they would be   
   >of the as yet unknown variety.   
      
       Why can't you comprehend the very obvious possibility that if there is a   
   God   
   associated with Earth every faith has some incorrect interpretations about him?   
   Do you have any idea why you can't conceive of such an obvious possibility?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)