XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:57:23 -0500, Free Lunch wrote:
.
>On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:38:54 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
> wrote:
>
>>In article , mur <> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:00:00 -0600, Free Lunch
wrote:
>>> .
>>> >On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:34:43 -0500, mur wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:15:22 -0600, Free Lunch
>>> >>wrote:
>>> >>.
>>> >>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:50:22 -0500, mur wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:00:47 -0600, Free Lunch
>>> >>>>wrote:
>>> >>>>.
>>> >>>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:42:02 -0500, mur wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:32:40 -0600, Free Lunch
>>> >>>>>>wrote:
>>> >>>>>>.
>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:49:38 -0500, mur wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:00:09 -0600, Free Lunch
>>> >>>>>>>>wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>.
>>> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:52:34 -0700, A Nony Mouse
>>> >>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>...
>>> >>>>>>>>>>A careful person will not reject the possibility of no gods
>>> >>>>>>>>>>existing on
>>> >>>>>>>>>>the basis of any evidence as yet presented, nor reject the
reverse
>>> >>>>>>>>>>possibility on that evidence.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>Such careful persons are called agnostics.
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>Not really. Agnostics say that they do not know and cannot know if
>>> >>>>>>>>>any
>>> >>>>>>>>>deities exist. They may be believers or not be believers.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Do you think there's no distinction between strong and weak
>>> >>>>>>>> agnostics? How
>>> >>>>>>>>about strong and weak atheists? Your idiot brother bilgat can't
>>> >>>>>>>>comprehend the
>>> >>>>>>>>distinction between any of them, or even that there is a
distinction.
>>> >>>>>>>>Are you as
>>> >>>>>>>>clueless as that idiot?
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>I have no idea what distinction you imagine exists among agnostics
>>> >>>>>>>other
>>> >>>>>>>than belief in god or unbelief, theist or atheist.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Strong agnostics believe it can't be known whether or not God
>>> >>>>>> exists. Weak
>>> >>>>>>agnostics believe that if God does exist it is possible for some
people
>>> >>>>>>to know
>>> >>>>>>it. I'm a weak agnostic and consider strong agnosticism to be even
more
>>> >>>>>>stupid
>>> >>>>>>than strong atheism.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>Tell us about the evidence that can be gathered to show that a deity
>>> >>>>>exists.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> For a person to know it it would be between God and the
>>> >>>> individual...LOL...
>>> >>>>It's amusing to think you feel there should be proof for everyone
always
>>> >>>>available. It's like if you think everyone who goes in Walmart should
be
>>> >>>>entitled to get a paycheck even if they don't work there. Hilarious!
Not
>>> >>>>so much
>>> >>>>that there couldn't be a planet with a God who DOES provide free easy
>>> >>>>proof for
>>> >>>>everybody, but since it's obvious that's not the case here it's amusing
>>> >>>>that you
>>> >>>>think it should be that way and keep demanding it...LOL... over and
over
>>> >>>>and
>>> >>>>over again.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>So you have no evidence that any deity exists
>>> >>
>>> >> No that's a lie and by now I feel sure I've presented you with
evidence
>>> >>meaning that you're aware it's a lie.
>>> >
>>> >I'm sure you have never presented any evidence that any deities exist.
>>> >If you imagine you have, please repost
>>>
>>> Life itself is evidence.
>>
>>How is "life itself" evidence?
>
>Logic is a concept that mur refuses to try to understand.
Try to apply it to why you think life is not evidence.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
