XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.recovery.catholicism   
   From: duckgumbo32@cox.net   
      
   On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:02:45 -0700, Virgil  wrote:   
      
   >In article ,   
   > duke  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:17:26 -0700, Virgil  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >In article <08q9i517grml5e3o07mjs7ctvn0tn53154@4ax.com>,   
   >> > duke  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >> Gen 1-11, which includes the Noah flood, is not a scientific explanation   
   >> >> of   
   >> >> the   
   >> >> creation of the universe and all in it.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Simply put for simpletons like you, nothing pre-Abraham is scientific.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Your turn.   
   >> >   
   >> >It is not whether is is scientific, but whether it has any   
   >> >correspondence to real history at all that is of issue.   
   >>   
   >> Gobbler, real history takes time, and the flood is not scientific.   
   >>   
   >> Good grief but you're ignorant.   
   >   
   >Not as ignorant, nor as foolish, as those who put their faith in fairy   
   >tales.   
      
   Then cut it out.  You fable pushers that God is a myth have no where to go.   
      
      
   The Dukester, American-American   
   *****   
   "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."   
   Pope Paul VI   
   *****   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)