XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.religion.christian, alt.agnosticism   
   XPost: alt.athiesm, alt.atheism   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:30:38 -0500, old man joe  wrote   
   in alt.talk.creationism:   
      
   >   
   >everybody knows that certain conditions of what they call " nature " must, of   
   necessity,   
   >be in play in order to make a fossil out of bones and teeth of dinosaur's.    
   these certain   
   >conditions must be in play also for organic remains to be fossilize.   
   >   
   >when a dinosaur was killed by another dinosaur, whatever bones lay on top the   
   ground   
   >simply was not preserved by the forces of " nature " in order to weather time   
   so that it's   
   >bones and teeth would fossilize... what was not eaten simply decayed and   
   returned to dust.   
   >   
   >the word " fossil " is from a Latin term " fossus " meaning " having been dug   
   up. "   
   >   
   >the conditions necessary to fossilize bones and teeth require quick burial   
   and water   
   >sufficient to transport ground minerals into the fabric of the bones over   
   time of the   
   >animal buried.   
   >   
   >searching the Internet for locations of fossil finds across the globe we have   
   very   
   >interesting facts posted by Evolutionists that defeat their own philosophy of   
   Evolution.   
   >we therefore have, to their own ignorance, their help in defeating   
   Evolution.  Evolution   
   >is easily defeated by the simple fact that everything that is alive is not   
   alive by reason   
   >of the non living elements of which it is comprised.   
      
   Your ignorance of science is noted. No doubt you will draw foolish   
   conclusions based on that ignorance.   
      
   >the philosophy of Evolution steers around this most basic foundation thus   
   exposing itself   
   >as a complete and utter fraud... life, is simply not found in the non living   
   elements of   
   >the Periodic Table.   
      
   There are no living elements, you intentionally ignorant fool.   
      
   >the Evolutionists, as their ever changing philosophy stands today, states   
   that a minimum   
   >of 10 thousand years or greater is necessary to have gone by to call   
   something a fossil.   
   >that's pretty interesting since the only event in the history of the world   
   sufficient to   
   >meet the requirements of fossilization is a global flood which took place   
   just under 7   
   >thousand years ago... the Flood caused by God commonly called the Flood of   
   Noah.   
      
   The evidence is clear that the Flood did not happen.   
      
   >since the decay of a dead animal laying on top of the ground can not meet the   
   physical   
   >requirements necessary to fossilize its bones immediate burial in sediment is   
   the only   
   >medium suitable to begin the fossilization process.  an amount of surface   
   water, as that   
   >of a flood, is required to physically bury a creature in the shortest   
   possible time.   
   >   
   >melting glacier's can not meet this requirement... a flood does.   
      
   Floods are one possible source, but, as I mentioned, everyone knows that   
   Noah's Flood could not have happened. Claiming that Noah's Flood is   
   actually an historic event mocks God and shows everyone how   
   intentionally foolish you are.   
      
   >interestingly enough, using today's Mount Everest as a model and not   
   factoring in the   
   >"  all the fountains of the great deep burst open " of Gen. 7:11,  it rained   
   on the earth   
   >in the Flood of Noah nearly 400 inches an hour... enough to cause massive   
   erosion on such   
   >a scale to bury all creatures not invited on the Ark.  but this model is   
   speculation   
   >only... the Evolutionists love to speculate so why can't the elect ?   
      
   Because the physical evidence shows that your fantasy did not happen.   
   Your claim that scientists are speculating about evolution shows your   
   profound ignorance of science and unwillingness to admit that you teach   
   false doctrines.   
      
   >yet, the water's of the Flood of Noah came from both the ground water of the   
   earth   
   >bursting open as well as heavy rain's thus fulfilling the requirement of   
   quick burial of   
   >the dinosaur's in what became sedimentary rock.  the Flood is dated at nearly   
   7 thousand   
   >years ago by careful study of the " time keeper's " of Holy Scripture and   
   these time   
   >keeper's date the universe as just over 13 thousand year's of age.   
      
   There was no Flood. Get that through your immoral head.   
      
   >knowing that rational mind's do not come to the conclusion that life comes   
   from elements   
   >that are not alive we readily see why the Evolutionists avoid with haste and   
   cursing the   
   >answering of how life did in fact come from nothing alive.  their own   
   philosophy is their   
   >undoing and can be summed up by the words of the Living God " this is the   
   condemnation,   
   >that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light,   
   because their   
   >deeds were evil. "  Jn. 3:19   
      
   Do you really think that God needs you to tell lies on His behalf? Did   
   someone teach you that you won't go to Heaven if you don't tell lies   
   that supposedly help God? Is God so weak that he needs your foolishness   
   and ignorance to help him?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)