XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy
XPost: alt.talk.creationism, alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.ch
istnet.evangelical
XPost: alt.christnet.theology, alt.religion, alt.religion.baptist
XPost: alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christian.episcopal,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
XPost: alt.religion.christianity
From: Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com
old man joe schreef:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:48:42 +0100, Erwin Moller
> wrote:
>
>> old man joe schreef:
>>> wonderfully, God has so constructed the nature of man that even the
reprobate's bring glory to Him
>>> when they deny His existence or some particular work He has done. you can
read all about it in
>>> Php. 1:28; Jn. 8:43,44 for example.
>>
>> Hi, it is spammer Joe again.
>> Always a pleasure...
>>
>> Are you still having this habbit of spamming many newsgroups at once
>> without ever reading the responses?
>>
>> In that case: Stuff it, you coward.
>>
>> No point in crafting an intelligent reply to your lies.
>>
>> Erwin Moller
Congratulations, a response.
An evasive one, but at least a response.
>
> you can't craft an intelligent reply... you've shown that in this one...
I surely can.
The fact I didn't do it in the last reply is simply: I wasted a few
hours on you already, writing intelligent responses.
Your response? None at all.
Ducking. Evasive maneuvers, etc. The usual creationist actions.
I am perfectly willing to have a decent discussion with you.
I promise I'll stay civil.
But you and I both know you won't do that.
You had many chances before, and you always run.
So tell me, why should I AGAIN write a wellthought response to you?
You ignore everybody that doesn't hang on your lips, drinking your
words, and believing it all because Joe said it.
Sorry mate, I have a brain and can think for myself. I won't let a
fundie dictate how to think.
But still, if you care for a serious discussion about theism/atheism or
morality or whatever, I am here.
> you need to hide your
> ignorance by dodging and by making personal attacks as all Atheists in the
mold.
I don't need to hide my ignorance.
I am always willing to admit that I was not born with all knowledge.
Arrogance is the way of the creationist.
Claiming God exists without proof. Claiming Jesus lived and preformed
miracles. Claiming the bible is completely true, even though it is full
of contradictions. Claiming the Earth is 6000 years or or so, despite
scientific evidence that it is much older.
Really: arrogance is the way of the creationist.
Creationists are very reluctant to admit they don't know certain things
and simply make stuff up along. If somebody doubts their words, they
make an appeal to authority, and avoid the difficult questions in that
lame way.
I prefer the scientific way: A much better approach to reality because
that method has built into it ways to deal with nonsense.
So call me arrogant/ignorant all you will.
Irritated by this response?
Proof me wrong and start a discussion (and finish it!) instead of having
monologues in 10 newsgroups at the same time....
Erwin Moller
--
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."
-- C.A.R. Hoare
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
