XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.athiesm, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.talk.creationism   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:24:07 -0400, old man joe  wrote   
   in alt.talk.creationism:   
      
   >On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "IlBeBauck@gmail.com"   
    wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Apr 29, 5:41 am, old man joe  wrote:   
   >>> reason # 1.  since all mankind came from Adam and Eve and Adam of his own   
   free will chose rebellion   
   >>> against God rather than obedience, and because of God's judgment against   
   him, out of whom all   
   >>> mankind would be born, all of mankind has Original Sin imputed to their   
   account   Ps. 58:3;  Ro.   
   >>> 3:10-18... simply put,  " a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. "   
    Mt.7:17   
   >>>   
   >>> it's in the best interest of the Evolutionists to say that man came from a   
   monkey in order to avoid   
   >>> being found in Adam, in whom all die. 1 Cor. 15:22  the death in view here   
   is the Second Death.   
   >>>   
   >>> reason # 2.  since the Flood is an integral part of God's judgment against   
   wicked people, as is   
   >>> Sodom and Gomorrah, in that He required their life of them that perished   
   in the Flood of Noah, after   
   >>> all, life is His possession, not ours, He can not be stopped when He   
   requires it back...   
   >>>   
   >>> therefore the Evolutionists do not want a Global Flood because the Global   
   Flood is God's actual   
   >>> punishment against one type of people... the sinner, those in rebellion   
   against God.  God is on   
   >>> record as once again about to destroy sinner's but this time it will be   
   the whole universe, after   
   >>> the Day of Judgment.  Mt. 24   
   >>>   
   >>> because man is made in the image of God he knows very well which side of   
   the fence he is on and the   
   >>> Bible speaks to this when in it God says the wicked are " without excuse "   
   in His eyes.  Ro. 1:18-20   
   >>>   
   >>> oh yes, the Evolutionists like to call anyone countering their position   
   filthy names, and in so   
   >>> doing profess their Original Sin.  they need to feel superior and their   
   best approach is to make   
   >>> those whom respect the Living God, sound stupid.  yet, not one of them is   
   able to show how life came   
   >>> from elements that are not alive which is the starting point of proving   
   how like evolved out of   
   >>> non-living elements... the elements comprising their human ( not monkey )   
   bodies are not alive and   
   >>> are of the same type as those in a dead person. why then is one person   
   alive and another dead though   
   >>> they are comprised of the exact same stuff ?  because life comes from the   
   Living God... He gives it   
   >>> and He takes it back.   
   >>>   
   >>> the Evolutionists, as smart as they think they are, can not concoct a   
   scheme to explain how every   
   >>> element in them is not alive though they are physically alive.   
   >>>   
   >>> Evolution can not be true since it is not possible to get life out of the   
   non-living elements of the   
   >>> earth.  Evolution is nothing more than an attack against Jesus Christ   
   Eternal God who spoke the   
   >>> universe into being and gave life to the living things we see around us,   
   and we ourselves as well.   
   >>>   
   >>> Evolutionists are nothing more than the anti-Christs spoken of in 1 Jn.   
   2:18.   
   >>>   
   >>> interestingly enough, the secular dictionary defines ' atheist ' as one   
   who denies or disbelieves in   
   >>> the existence of God or gods.  the Word of God, the Bible, defines an '   
   atheist ' as one whom God   
   >>> has passed by for salvation which He alone provides.  Eph. 2:12   
   >>   
   >>True what you say.  Rebellion is the state of mankind. But God gives   
   >>us all a chance at overcoming that if we will accept Christ who died   
   >>on the cross for us.  Rejecting God all of ones life, is an eternal   
   >>crime ...one that none of us have to pay .  Be reconciled to God and   
   >>stop hoping that we came from a pond protozoa that came from dead   
   >>chemicals.   
   >   
   >   
   >to the contrary... there is no salvation based on man " accepting " Christ.    
   Jn. 1:12,13;   
   >Jn. 3:3;  Acts13:48;  Gal.2:16.   
   >   
   >the elect are justified freely by His grace. ( Ro. 3:24 ) one merits   
   salvation, which is contrary to   
   >grace, which is undeserved merit, when he ' accepts ' Christ.  such is the   
   gospel of co-redemption.   
   >   
   >Christ died for the elect alone... not the whole world... otherwise, the   
   whole world is saved.   
   >   
   >can you not read the body of the post and understand it ?   
      
   So you are not elect and that pisses you off.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)